US u-turn on corruption abroad 'won't drive rise in deals won by bribery'
Donald Trump’s decision to “pause” rules banning bribery abroad will not have much impact, according ...
Dutch organisations, including KLM and the government, are fighting back over Kalitta Air’s claim that its slots at Schiphol Airport were “wrongfully withheld”.
Last month, the US cargo carrier called on the US Department of Transportation (DoT) to restrict or suspend KLM’s US cargo operations due to a complaint made against the Dutch government, Schiphol (AMS) and Stichting Airport Coordination Netherlands (ACNL).
Kalitta claimed “unjustifiably and unreasonably discriminatory” actions to restrict its access to the Amsterdam-New York route.
In a filing to the DoT, ...
Transpacific sees first major MSC blanks as rates fall and volumes falter
'It’s healthy competition' Maersk tells forwarders bidding for same business
Opposition builds for final hearing on US plan to tax Chinese box ship calls
White House confirms automotive tariffs – 'a disaster for the industry'
New price hikes may slow ocean spot rate slide – but for how long?
Supply chain delays expected after earthquake hits Myanmar
Shippers snap up airfreight capacity to US ahead of tariff deadline
Good start for Gemini, liner schedule reliability data reveals
Comment on this article
Jonathan Holmes
March 04, 2019 at 6:19 am“KLM also denies receiving preferential treatment from the Dutch authorities, saying the claim was “patently false”.
“In KLM’s experience, ACNL has been scrupulously even-handed in its treatment of airlines. The discrimination Kalitta alleges simply does not exist, and Kalitta’s false narrative provides no basis whatsoever for retaliation against KLM or its affiliates.”|
Doesn’t the Dutch government now have the second largest equity share (~13%) of AF/KL? Slightly lower than the French government share of 14%… So obviously they must be very impartial about decisions that affect the value of their investment.
The US government owns 0% of Kalitta. And the reality is that not only are US carriers competing directly against other carriers but are also competing with the funding and influence of their respective governments as well.