OceanX: Mærsk rally overshadows post-US-China trade deal news
We could all benefit from a little dose of optimism
Soren Skou, Maersk CEO, used Singapore Maritime Week to urge governments to stop subsidising shipping lines. He argues that subsidies cause overcapacity and unnecessary price reductions – and there is no strategic reason for governments to get involved. He said companies were building ships that were “not needed, for companies which were not profitable and did not have a profitable business model”. He refrained from pointing the finger at any particular company, but as the WSJ points out, some Asian operators have ...
Keep our news independent, by supporting The Loadstar
Red Sea crisis has driven most new capacity into extended Asia-Europe trades
Rapid transpacific capacity build-up continues – can USWC ports handle it?
Crew forced to abandon ship in latest fire on vessel carrying EVs
The Loadstar Podcast | Transport Logistic and Air Cargo Europe 2025
Carriers on the hunt for open tonnage again as transpacific rates soar
'Now or never' for Kuehne and DHL GF to hit back at DSV
Uncertainty drives Yang Ming fleet boost as focus switches to Asia-Europe trades
Carrier price hikes hold, driving spot rates higher as space gets scarcer
Asia-West Africa ULCV deployment opens new markets for carriers
Project cargo: oversized and heavy, posing risks outside the norm for ports
CMA CGM eyeing multi-billion euro investment programme in Algeria
News in Brief Podcast | Week 22 | Trump’s tariff hurdle, ocean schedule reliability, and rate rise
Turkish Airlines falls foul of air safety regulations, claims India's aviation authority
Air cargo players still wary of long-term block space deals – 'a risk on both sides'
Geely splashes out to meet growing demand by chartering its own car-carrier
Comment on this article
Ross Delaney
April 27, 2018 at 11:18 pmBut perhaps he said less about removing the subsidies for mega ports and the white elephant infrastructure built behind them that supports his ULCV fleet in the face of the logistical economic absurdity that they represent?