Political fallout may delay Panama Ports Co sale to BlackRock-TiL
Tomorrow’s deadline for CK Hutchison to sell its 90% stake in Panama Ports Company (PPC) ...
Shippers are not entitled to any funds paid out by airlines to forwarders in the long-running air cargo antitrust case, a New York court has ruled.
The reason, it says, is because freight forwarders acted as more than agents.
Shippers such as DuPont and Sears had argued that, as buyers of air cargo services using freight forwarders only as brokers, they were entitled to settlements offered by a group of airlines accused of breaking antitrust legislation.
However, the court ruled that as indirect purchasers ...
Keep our news independent, by supporting The Loadstar
Spot rates on transpacific surge after news of tariff time-out
European port congestion now at five-to-six days, and getting worse
'Cargo collision' expected as transpacific capacity tightens and rates rise
Houthis declare blockade of port of Haifa – 'vessels calling will be targets'
Another CMA CGM vessel heading for Suez Canal – 'to mitigate schedule delay'
News in Brief Podcast | Week 20 | 90-day countdown, India and Pakistan
Threat to airport operations as India revokes security clearance for handler Çelebi
South America will benefit as air cargo traffic diverts from the transpacific
CMA CGM will carry on investing after 'solid' Q1, despite unclear outlook
Demand for transpac airfreight capacity returning – but 'it's not ecommerce-driven'
Ocean rates rise after tariff pause acts as 'starting gun' for more front-loading
Air cargo forwarders stick to spot rates – a long-term contract would be 'foolish'
Brazil's outdated and inefficient ports the barrier to economic growth
Yang Ming chief announces rethink on ordering 'megamax' box ships
Navigating supply chain trends in 2025: efficiency, visibility, and adaptability
Comment on this article
Andy Robins
April 12, 2016 at 1:53 amThat is interesting, if the Airlines were in cahoots with these Agents they are both guilty. Thus the Shippers should have sued the Agents based on the HAWB and the carriers where a direct MAWB was used citing the Shipper as Consignor.