'Bitter-sweet' MEPC 83 follows COP 29, narrowing scope of climate commitments
IMO’s Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC) 83 meeting, meant to establish robust mid-term decarbonisation measures, ...
The IMO has urged regulators to take a “pragmatic” approach to the new SOLAS VGM requirements for the first three months after launch.
The body’s Maritime Safety Committee agreed that while there should be no delays to the July 1 implementation date, it would be beneficial if enforcement agencies took a “practical and pragmatic approach”.
A circular, sent to relevant agencies, noted that a more relaxed approach initially would be particularly beneficial for containers packed before July 1, but transhipped after, and thus ...
Maersk Air Cargo sees volumes fall as it aims for 'margin in favour of revenue'
Keep our news independent, by supporting The Loadstar
Container spot rates diverge: to Europe still falling, but firmer to the US
Hapag-Lloyd won't take bookings if port congestion leaves cargo stranded
Ecommerce likely the front-runner in resurge of transpacific trade after deal
China-US trade tariff pause could drive a rebound for transpacific rates
Airfreight players eye new routes as demand on the transpacific nosedives
Volume surge and an early peak season? 'Don't celebrate too soon,' warning
Service chaos from trade ban with India a problem for Pakistan shippers
Airfreight rates ex-China 'loss-making', but hopes of a trade deal stay high
Indian coastal freight attracts major carriers, but regional tension disrupts
Serious threat to jobs in US logistics as tariffs cause economic 'stagflation'
Comment on this article
Andy Lane
May 24, 2016 at 2:22 pmThis is a little fluffy (or to use another maybe more appropriate word – spurious) from IMO. And I am not so sure that helps ease confusion, but just creates more unwanted grey-areas.
What IMO maybe should have said more directly is that “any container packed on or after July 1st is subject to the new SOLAS (VGM) rules, but that leniency for those packed before or already in transit will be granted”. That would be a lot clearer.
They can also suggest that hard-core enforcement in terms of checks, audits and punishments should be ramped up gradually over the first 3 months.
I have seen many interpret IMO’s words to mean, “great, we do not need to do anything different until September 30th”, which I am sure is not what they wished to convey.
If you have out-reach to IMO, then to request some deeper clarification might be good insights for the Lines and Shippers who are following The Loadstar news feeds.