'Bitter-sweet' MEPC 83 follows COP 29, narrowing scope of climate commitments
IMO’s Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC) 83 meeting, meant to establish robust mid-term decarbonisation measures, ...
The IMO has urged regulators to take a “pragmatic” approach to the new SOLAS VGM requirements for the first three months after launch.
The body’s Maritime Safety Committee agreed that while there should be no delays to the July 1 implementation date, it would be beneficial if enforcement agencies took a “practical and pragmatic approach”.
A circular, sent to relevant agencies, noted that a more relaxed approach initially would be particularly beneficial for containers packed before July 1, but transhipped after, and thus ...
Volume surge and an early peak season? 'Don't celebrate too soon,' warning
Keep our news independent, by supporting The Loadstar
Shippers should check out the 'small print' in China-US tariff cuts
China-US trade tariff pause could drive a rebound for transpacific rates
Ecommerce likely the front-runner in resurge of transpacific trade after deal
Service chaos from trade ban with India a problem for Pakistan shippers
Spot rates on transpacific surge after news of tariff time-out
Carriers impose 'emergency operation' surcharges on Pakistan cargo
Comment on this article
Andy Lane
May 24, 2016 at 2:22 pmThis is a little fluffy (or to use another maybe more appropriate word – spurious) from IMO. And I am not so sure that helps ease confusion, but just creates more unwanted grey-areas.
What IMO maybe should have said more directly is that “any container packed on or after July 1st is subject to the new SOLAS (VGM) rules, but that leniency for those packed before or already in transit will be granted”. That would be a lot clearer.
They can also suggest that hard-core enforcement in terms of checks, audits and punishments should be ramped up gradually over the first 3 months.
I have seen many interpret IMO’s words to mean, “great, we do not need to do anything different until September 30th”, which I am sure is not what they wished to convey.
If you have out-reach to IMO, then to request some deeper clarification might be good insights for the Lines and Shippers who are following The Loadstar news feeds.