Latest order takes MSC box ship orderbook past 2m teu mark
MSC has returned to Zhoushan Changhong International Shipyard for up to eight 21,700 teu LNG ...
© Khunaspix Dreamstime.
By Alex Lennane
Shipping lines have defended what shippers described as “insane” charges for ‘street turns’, claiming customers will ultimately save on costs.
Last week, shippers slammed the charges announced by ZIM, HMM, SM Lines and Maersk of between $40 and $75 for containers which are fully used in both directions.
However, a spokesperson for ZIM said: “ZIM is affording truckers of its cargo the option of street turn moves as this helps reducing congestion and emissions.
“The related charge is charged due to the additional logistic and administrative burden ...
Comment on this article
chas deller
January 21, 2019 at 3:43 pmAlex – Do you know if the Street turn $ is for USA only or is it a Global fee ?
Chas
Alex Lennane
January 21, 2019 at 3:52 pmHi Chas,
According to Avantida, Maersk’s platform, in Europe the average fee for a street turn or triangulation ranges from 30 to 50 euros, depending on the country and shipping line. Maersk said that the charges outlined in this article are only for North America. HMM and Zin’s announcements were to “UIIA Motor Carrier Participants” – which I believe are US. Does that help?
Cheers
Alex
Theodor Strauss
January 21, 2019 at 3:58 pmThe Loadstar would do many a big favour to explain a ”street turn” more fully as I suspect that this container slang is different in the USA compared to elsewhere.
Alex Lennane
January 21, 2019 at 4:01 pmSorry! I’ll defer to the US Agriculture Transportation Coalition, which used this nice and simple explanation:
What is a “street turn”?
A ‘street turn’ is when a trucker and a container are fully utilized in both
directions, both out of the marine terminal, and back (as opposed to
having the container empty in one direction). One truck does a ’round
trip’, avoiding having two trucks, two trips to accomplish the same
thing.
Street turns:
reduce trucks in port areas and on highways
reduce congestion,
reduce fuel used,
reduce emissions
reduce demand for containers and chassis, which are
often on short supply,
reduce costs for exporters, importers, ocean carriers
I hope that helps.
Chris Locher
January 21, 2019 at 5:47 pmAn important point is the fact that when a trucker street turns a container, it saves the carrier gate charges, lift charges and storage charges at the carrier’s CY, because the CY never sees the box. Gate+lifts alone equate to at least $100 in service fees that are eliminated when a truck street turns a box. These cost savings more than offset any additional admin cost incurred by the ocean carrier.
The carrier receives as much benefit or more than the trucker, yet the carrier wants to charge a fee to enjoy said savings.
A simple “thank-you” would be more appropriate!
Joris Willems
January 22, 2019 at 1:21 pmWhere I fully understand this reasoning, many seem to overlook/ignore that it is the shipping line’s container that enables cost savings with the hauliers. From that perspective, carriers believe that they are entitled to a slice of those savings since they were done on the back of their assets/investments.
That said, pointing towards admin costs as a reasoning is ridiculous from a carrier’s perspective as in fact, they are saving on admin by implementing an automated solution… For the Lines, this is effectively a double-whammy.
All in all, Shipping Lines have been benefiting from savings in CY costs (handlings/storage) for decades and are now trying to increase their share of the overall end-to-end savings that a street-turn (or triangulation) brings to the supply chain. That money is coming out of the hauliers’ share and they are now forced to recalculate whether streetturns make sense….or whether they should return the box to the Line’s depot (and therefore significantly increase the end-to-end supply chain cost for all, yet mostly for the Line)