Political fallout may delay Panama Ports Co sale to BlackRock-TiL
Tomorrow’s deadline for CK Hutchison to sell its 90% stake in Panama Ports Company (PPC) ...
Shippers are not entitled to any funds paid out by airlines to forwarders in the long-running air cargo antitrust case, a New York court has ruled.
The reason, it says, is because freight forwarders acted as more than agents.
Shippers such as DuPont and Sears had argued that, as buyers of air cargo services using freight forwarders only as brokers, they were entitled to settlements offered by a group of airlines accused of breaking antitrust legislation.
However, the court ruled that as indirect purchasers ...
Maersk Air Cargo sees volumes fall as it aims for 'margin in favour of revenue'
Keep our news independent, by supporting The Loadstar
Container spot rates diverge: to Europe still falling, but firmer to the US
Hapag-Lloyd won't take bookings if port congestion leaves cargo stranded
Ecommerce likely the front-runner in resurge of transpacific trade after deal
China-US trade tariff pause could drive a rebound for transpacific rates
Volume surge and an early peak season? 'Don't celebrate too soon,' warning
Airfreight players eye new routes as demand on the transpacific nosedives
Service chaos from trade ban with India a problem for Pakistan shippers
Airfreight rates ex-China 'loss-making', but hopes of a trade deal stay high
Indian coastal freight attracts major carriers, but regional tension disrupts
Serious threat to jobs in US logistics as tariffs cause economic 'stagflation'
Comment on this article
Andy Robins
April 12, 2016 at 1:53 amThat is interesting, if the Airlines were in cahoots with these Agents they are both guilty. Thus the Shippers should have sued the Agents based on the HAWB and the carriers where a direct MAWB was used citing the Shipper as Consignor.