Widespread blanked sailings stave off major collapse of transpacific rates
Spot rates across all the major east-west deepsea trades continued their downward descent this week, ...
As container shipping lines prepare to introduce a new round of peak season surcharges on the trunk Asia-Europe trade, overcapacity is causing forwarders to fear that rates are set to undergo another period of profound volatility.
“I think that at the moment we are at the high point, and the fear is that they will go down again – the carriers try to maintain and raise rates, but recent peak season surcharges and general rate increases didn’t go through,” said Volker ...
Volume surge and an early peak season? 'Don't celebrate too soon,' warning
Keep our news independent, by supporting The Loadstar
Shippers should check out the 'small print' in China-US tariff cuts
China-US trade tariff pause could drive a rebound for transpacific rates
Ecommerce likely the front-runner in resurge of transpacific trade after deal
Service chaos from trade ban with India a problem for Pakistan shippers
Spot rates on transpacific surge after news of tariff time-out
Carriers impose 'emergency operation' surcharges on Pakistan cargo
Comment on this article
Yvan
July 20, 2012 at 2:45 pmVery informative article from Gavin as usual .
I will add that liners are currently all (re)announcing a general slow steaming strategy to absorb more capacity and secure fuel saving in the long run. Customers take the hit once again.
Gavin van Marle
July 20, 2012 at 5:16 pmDid they really need to (re)announce that?! “Slow steaming is here to stay” is repeated by every carrier at every opportunity they have. It has become the new industry mantra.
niamh
July 23, 2012 at 6:30 amThe capacity issues creates imbalance between the demand and supply of the product. Container supply will surely decline.
Cherry Wang
July 23, 2012 at 11:14 amThe key question is how the imbalance will be addressed – it’s evident that there is an imbalance right now, but how carriers manage their capacity is another issue.
Cherry Wang
July 23, 2012 at 9:12 amInteresting points raised Gavin.
Most of the chartered vessels, as you highlighted from Alphaliner above, are below the panamax size category. With a number of the new vessels being delivered in the ultra large size category (>9,000 teus) and mainly deployed on the Far East – Europe / Middle East / Med trade lanes, overcapacity will strike again as Europe is imploding. So I think it will be interesting to see how carriers choose to allocate their loses – either by running vessels at low utilisation levels, idling vessels, cascading, or deploying vessels on other trade lanes (if possible).
Gavin van Marle
July 23, 2012 at 11:24 amMy current sense is that the lines are heading towards your former option – operating at lower utilisation levels while clinging on to as high rates as possible. I’m just back from interviewing carriers in Hamburg, and came away with that impression. And I think this speech from Hapag-Lloyd’s Jesper Praestensgaard gives further credence to this change in mindset: https://theloadstar.com/why-kill-the-carriers-for-just-2-of-costs-asks-hapag-lloyd/