The big supply chain disruptor is the regulators, say shippers
Shippers need their supply chain partners to collaborate in order to speed up processes and ...
IATA has insisted that its new eAWB product for smaller forwarders is simply filling a gap in the e-freight market and not competing. But IT suppliers say what is “urgently needed” is awareness, not more products.
IATA Cargo is in the process of rolling out a new, simple form-fill, eAWB for low-volume forwarders, which is expected to launch by the end of March, a move some companies claim is unnecessary in an already competitive market.
But Glyn Hughes, chief of IATA cargo, said: ...
Keep our news independent, by supporting The Loadstar
Volume surge and an early peak season? 'Don't celebrate too soon,' warning
Ecommerce likely the front-runner in resurge of transpacific trade after deal
China-US trade tariff pause could drive a rebound for transpacific rates
Shippers should check out the 'small print' in China-US tariff cuts
Service chaos from trade ban with India a problem for Pakistan shippers
Carriers impose 'emergency operation' surcharges on Pakistan cargo
15% rebate for box ships as Suez Canal Authority woos carriers
Comment on this article
David Ambridge
October 20, 2015 at 3:41 amI think this is a positive move from IATA but clearly it is nowhere near enough!We still have too many Airlines who have not adopted the Single Process and are below 10% E-AWB penetration. How can this be possible after so many years? Why is EU the worst performing continent on this? Legacy systems maybe? let’s hope that 2016 is a better year for this than 2015 has been.
Monty Clark
October 21, 2015 at 3:41 pmLet’s set the record straight. eAWB capabilities are just a fraction of the benefit of the overall IATA e-Freight initiative. The real benefits come by eliminating all paper processes from air cargo shipments. That’s where most of the $4.9B savings lie, that’s where we can cut days off the shipping process and do it all with dramatically enhanced security. It is imperative that IATA not introduce a system that will channel users into another dead end that can’t easily support a true paperless solution. We have enough dead end systems now, and don’t need any more.