Analysis: 2020 – the financial watershed year for Hapag-Lloyd
When Rolf Habben Jansen took the helm of Hapag-Lloyd in 2014, the German carrier was ...
Shippers and forwarders could face multi-million-dollar bills from Hanjin if its creditors sue customers which failed to deliver all the cargo stated in the Minimum Quantity Commitment (MQC).
According to consultancy SeaIntel, shippers could face claims for between $40m and $300m.
The potential claims follow similar action involving The ...
Keep our news independent, by supporting The Loadstar
Rapid transpacific capacity build-up continues – can USWC ports handle it?
Red Sea crisis has driven most new capacity into extended Asia-Europe trades
Crew forced to abandon ship in latest fire on vessel carrying EVs
Carriers on the hunt for open tonnage again as transpacific rates soar
The Loadstar Podcast | Transport Logistic and Air Cargo Europe 2025
'Now or never' for Kuehne and DHL GF to hit back at DSV
Uncertainty drives Yang Ming fleet boost as focus switches to Asia-Europe trades
Carrier price hikes hold, driving spot rates higher as space gets scarcer
Asia-West Africa ULCV deployment opens new markets for carriers
Project cargo: oversized and heavy, posing risks outside the norm for ports
CMA CGM eyeing multi-billion euro investment programme in Algeria
News in Brief Podcast | Week 22 | Trump’s tariff hurdle, ocean schedule reliability, and rate rise
Air cargo players still wary of long-term block space deals – 'a risk on both sides'
Longer-term planning needed as noise out of Washington distorts the market
Geely splashes out to meet growing demand by chartering its own car-carrier
Comment on this article
Alex von Stempel
October 16, 2016 at 1:40 pmIf if can be proved that most parties (shippers and carriers) can be found to have persistently ignored Minimum Quantity Commitments in Service Contracts, how can HANJIN creditors hope to win such a case against HANJIN customers who may have fallen foul of MQCs in the past? If moreover it can be proved that despite of some customers having not fulfilled MQCs that some of the same customers had been offered subsequent discounts what chance would HANJIN Creditors have that courts might rule in their favour?