Global revenues soar, but loss of steam for OOCL's Asia-Europe trade
Hong Kong-headquartered container shipping line OOCL today issued its fourth-quarter 2024 operational update, giving the ...
CHRW: UPGRADESZIM: LAGGARDFWRD: LEADING THE REBOUNDMAERSK: OPPORTUNISTIC UPGRADETSLA: GETTING OUTDSV: DOWN BELOW KEY LEVELLINE: DOWN TO ALL-TIME LOWS AMZN: DEI HURDLESAAPL: DEI RECOMMENDATIONAAPL: INNOVATIONF: MAKING MONEY IN CHINAMAERSK: THE DAY AFTERDHL: NEW DEAL
CHRW: UPGRADESZIM: LAGGARDFWRD: LEADING THE REBOUNDMAERSK: OPPORTUNISTIC UPGRADETSLA: GETTING OUTDSV: DOWN BELOW KEY LEVELLINE: DOWN TO ALL-TIME LOWS AMZN: DEI HURDLESAAPL: DEI RECOMMENDATIONAAPL: INNOVATIONF: MAKING MONEY IN CHINAMAERSK: THE DAY AFTERDHL: NEW DEAL
There have been mixed reports about the success of the China-Europe rail service, and this SCMP article is one of the more negative viewpoints. While forwarders and shippers have been extolling the virtues of the service – it’s speed versus ocean and its price versus air – its big failing is the one-way traffic, which increases the cost of China’s goods. China’s European imports tend to be mechanical equipment and precision instruments, not commodities which have embraced rail freight as yet. However, increasing demand for European foodstuffs in China could result in greater traffic eastbound, although will take some time for the market pick up.
Maersk and MSC fire first shots in new freight rate war on Asia-Europe trades
US port strike called off as ILA and USMX reach 'tentative' agreement
Cosco share price falls after US lists carrier as a Chinese 'military asset'
$7bn infrastructure project heads list of expansion plans for India's busy ports
Alliance reshuffle will increase box ship shortage as carriers hunt 'buffers'
Evergreen staff bonuses soar again, as carrier profits triple
Shipping Australia calls for end to 'disruptive' port strikes
Three new services and a transpacific focus for Ocean Alliance in 2025
Comment on this article