Trump-Houthis deal – expect further 'rate declines...after port congestion'
Ocean: supply-demand balance getting ‘structurally looser’?
As container shipping lines prepare to introduce a new round of peak season surcharges on the trunk Asia-Europe trade, overcapacity is causing forwarders to fear that rates are set to undergo another period of profound volatility.
“I think that at the moment we are at the high point, and the fear is that they will go down again – the carriers try to maintain and raise rates, but recent peak season surcharges and general rate increases didn’t go through,” said Volker ...
European port congestion now at five-to-six days, and getting worse
Keep our news independent, by supporting The Loadstar
'Cargo collision' expected as transpacific capacity tightens and rates rise
Houthis declare blockade of port of Haifa – 'vessels calling will be targets'
Another CMA CGM vessel heading for Suez Canal – 'to mitigate schedule delay'
Ocean rates rise after tariff pause acts as 'starting gun' for more front-loading
News in Brief Podcast | Week 20 | 90-day countdown, India and Pakistan
Navigating supply chain trends in 2025: efficiency, visibility, and adaptability
Demand for transpac airfreight capacity returning – but 'it's not ecommerce-driven'
CMA CGM will carry on investing after 'solid' Q1, despite unclear outlook
Air cargo forwarders stick to spot rates – a long-term contract would be 'foolish'
Yang Ming chief announces rethink on ordering 'megamax' box ships
Comment on this article
Yvan
July 20, 2012 at 2:45 pmVery informative article from Gavin as usual .
I will add that liners are currently all (re)announcing a general slow steaming strategy to absorb more capacity and secure fuel saving in the long run. Customers take the hit once again.
Gavin van Marle
July 20, 2012 at 5:16 pmDid they really need to (re)announce that?! “Slow steaming is here to stay” is repeated by every carrier at every opportunity they have. It has become the new industry mantra.
niamh
July 23, 2012 at 6:30 amThe capacity issues creates imbalance between the demand and supply of the product. Container supply will surely decline.
Cherry Wang
July 23, 2012 at 11:14 amThe key question is how the imbalance will be addressed – it’s evident that there is an imbalance right now, but how carriers manage their capacity is another issue.
Cherry Wang
July 23, 2012 at 9:12 amInteresting points raised Gavin.
Most of the chartered vessels, as you highlighted from Alphaliner above, are below the panamax size category. With a number of the new vessels being delivered in the ultra large size category (>9,000 teus) and mainly deployed on the Far East – Europe / Middle East / Med trade lanes, overcapacity will strike again as Europe is imploding. So I think it will be interesting to see how carriers choose to allocate their loses – either by running vessels at low utilisation levels, idling vessels, cascading, or deploying vessels on other trade lanes (if possible).
Gavin van Marle
July 23, 2012 at 11:24 amMy current sense is that the lines are heading towards your former option – operating at lower utilisation levels while clinging on to as high rates as possible. I’m just back from interviewing carriers in Hamburg, and came away with that impression. And I think this speech from Hapag-Lloyd’s Jesper Praestensgaard gives further credence to this change in mindset: https://theloadstar.com/why-kill-the-carriers-for-just-2-of-costs-asks-hapag-lloyd/