The terminal connections maze
In this blog post, senior ports and terminals director at Drewry Maritime Research Neil Davidson ...
A new breed of international container terminal operators has emerged over the past few years to challenge established companies which have traditionally dominated the sector.
Localised players, such as ICTSI, SSA Marine, Eurogate and HHLA, have always had particular strengths in certain areas, but for almost a decade the container terminal operating industry’s four main global players have been ever-present in bidding for new concessions and privatisation opportunities – Hutchison, PSA, DP World and APM Terminals.
Now however, according to the latest ...
Volume surge and an early peak season? 'Don't celebrate too soon,' warning
Shippers should check out the 'small print' in China-US tariff cuts
Spot rates on transpacific surge after news of tariff time-out
'Cargo collision' expected as transpacific capacity tightens and rates rise
Houthis declare blockade of port of Haifa – 'vessels calling will be targets'
Threat to airport operations as India revokes security clearance for handler Çelebi
MSC Antonia, a casualty of the epidemic of GPS area-denial
News in Brief Podcast | Week 20 | 90-day countdown, India and Pakistan
IATA to downgrade air cargo growth forecast 'to something more sustainable'
Amanda Jones Rasmussen returns to DHL GF as new global CCO
Maersk joins peers with emergency surcharges on Pakistan cargo
South America will benefit as air cargo traffic diverts from the transpacific
Evri gets 'Premium' boost from merger with DHL's UK ecommerce division
Another CMA CGM vessel heading for Suez Canal – 'to mitigate schedule delay'
Brazil's outdated and inefficient ports the barrier to economic growth
Hapag-Lloyd: a 'pretty good first quarter' – but trend for 2025 'pretty uncertain'
Comment on this article
Uwe Breitling
December 09, 2014 at 2:27 pmICTSI operates terminals in Asia, Australia, Africa, U.S., Latin America, Europe and Middle East. To classify such operations as ‘localized’ sounds a little bit arrogant or uninformed.
Gavin van Marle
December 11, 2014 at 12:55 pmIndeed it does, but the definition is Drewry’s not mine. The analyst uses several methods to ascertain the “globalness” of an operator, and makes a distinction between global and international terminal operators. A lot depends on how much volume comes from particular ports. In ICTSI’s case, while it has operations across the world a substantial portion of its volumes are generated in its home country, the Philippines.
Uwe Breitling
December 11, 2014 at 11:03 pmHutchinson, PSA and DP World also generate substantial volumes in their ‘home countries’. So what is their difference to ICTSI? Size, volume handled and years in the business?
Neil Davidson
December 21, 2014 at 9:32 amUwe – “Localized” isn’t a term we use to describe ICTSI in our report. However, as Gavin says, we do analyse each operator to measure how “global” they are (and the reality is that most are “international” rather than truly global). Using our method of determining how “global” each operator is, ICTSI comes out similarly to PSA, TIL and CMA CGM (but not as global as HPH, DPW and APMT).