Political fallout may delay Panama Ports Co sale to BlackRock-TiL
Tomorrow’s deadline for CK Hutchison to sell its 90% stake in Panama Ports Company (PPC) ...
In preparation for its container business merging into a “new” Hapag-Lloyd this year, troubled Chilean carrier CSAV is restructuring its liner business, according to Alphaliner.
It is part of a three-year-old plan designed to increase efficiency and boost profits.
The transport analyst says that ahead of the takeover, which will initially see CSAV as a 30% shareholder of the new entity, the carrier will divide its liner shipping activities into two companies: Norasia Container Lines (NCL) and CSAV Austral (SUAU), with the majority ...
Trump tariffs see hundreds of cancelled container bookings a day from Asia
'Disastrous' DSV-Schenker merger would 'disrupt European haulage market'
'To ship or not to ship', the question for US importers amid tariff uncertainty
'Chaos after chaos' coming from de minimis changes and more tariffs
List of blanked transpac sailings grows as trade war heats up and demand cools
EC approves DSV takeover of DB Schenker
Shippers in Asia restart ocean shipment bookings – but not from China
Forto 'sharpens commercial priorities' as it lays off one-third of staff
India withdraws access for Bangladesh transhipments, in 'very harmful' decision
'Tariff hell' leaves industries in limbo – 'not a great environment to plan'
IndiGo fleet expansion plan will include a major push to boost cargo volumes
Pre-tariff rush of goods from US to China sees air rates soar, but not for long
De minimis-induced ecommerce demand slump could cripple freighter operators
'Restoring America's maritime dominance' – stop laughing at the back of the class
Hapag 'took the bigger risk' when it signed up to Gemini, says Maersk
Navigating tariffs: 'like trying to solve a Rubik's cube while colour-blind'
Comment on this article
Ricky Forman
June 17, 2014 at 3:27 pmThe carrier community needs to realise that focusing on unit costs are only half the battle. Declining rates have more of an impact to the bottom line. Carriers need to be aware that they can hedge their income at levels much higher than agreed physical contract rates and therefore focus efforts on both sides of the equation. Where is the shareholder value coming from when Carriers do next to nothing to stop rate declines? Why would i invest into a company that wasn’t in control of its income and cashflow?