Weak demand and slimmer retail margins eat into airfreight spend
Concerns over excess inventories at retailers are misplaced: the real issue is weak demand and ...
Target, the US retailer infamous for its disastrous Canadian expansion which saw supply chain disruption lead to empty shelves, has outlined its latest plan: it is to invest $1bn in technology and its supply chain. It is also going to cut thousands of jobs, mostly in headquarters. It plans to focus on its mobile retailing, but with a “channel-agnostic” approach – ie, appealing to all sales channels. There will surely be a rush of supply chain providers happy to help ...
Keep our news independent, by supporting The Loadstar
Red Sea crisis has driven most new capacity into extended Asia-Europe trades
Rapid transpacific capacity build-up continues – can USWC ports handle it?
Crew forced to abandon ship in latest fire on vessel carrying EVs
The Loadstar Podcast | Transport Logistic and Air Cargo Europe 2025
Carriers on the hunt for open tonnage again as transpacific rates soar
Carrier price hikes hold, driving spot rates higher as space gets scarcer
Uncertainty drives Yang Ming fleet boost as focus switches to Asia-Europe trades
Asia-West Africa ULCV deployment opens new markets for carriers
Project cargo: oversized and heavy, posing risks outside the norm for ports
Turkish Airlines falls foul of air safety regulations, claims India's aviation authority
CMA CGM eyeing multi-billion euro investment programme in Algeria
News in Brief Podcast | Week 22 | Trump’s tariff hurdle, ocean schedule reliability, and rate rise
Air cargo players still wary of long-term block space deals – 'a risk on both sides'
Geely splashes out to meet growing demand by chartering its own car-carrier
Comment on this article
Suren
March 05, 2015 at 6:52 pmwhere is this all going to head? Supply chain has to grow and be optimised for developing business. However, the general trend of cutting jobs will backfire one day. The human factor cannot be completely ruled out, Nor should it be made a “disposable” option.
There are, surely, better solutions Why should the human factor be at the receiving end always?
Will all this end in self-loading-containers, self-routing-consignments?
Is the human factor such a “worthless” one?