Transpac benchmark Kerry Logistics: a mixed bag? Or...?
Please take heed
AMZN: APPEAL UPDATEDSV: PRESSURE BUILDS AAPL: OPENAI FUNDING INTERESTCHRW: ANOTHER INSIDER CASHES INHLAG: GRI DISCLOSUREMAERSK: HOVERING AROUND FOUR-MONTH LOWSTSLA: CHINA COMPETITIONDHL: BOLT-ON DEAL TALKAMZN: NEW ZEALAND PROJECTDHL: SURCHARGE RISKKNIN: LEGAL RISKF: 'DEI' HURDLESPLD: RATING UPDATEXOM: DISPOSALS
AMZN: APPEAL UPDATEDSV: PRESSURE BUILDS AAPL: OPENAI FUNDING INTERESTCHRW: ANOTHER INSIDER CASHES INHLAG: GRI DISCLOSUREMAERSK: HOVERING AROUND FOUR-MONTH LOWSTSLA: CHINA COMPETITIONDHL: BOLT-ON DEAL TALKAMZN: NEW ZEALAND PROJECTDHL: SURCHARGE RISKKNIN: LEGAL RISKF: 'DEI' HURDLESPLD: RATING UPDATEXOM: DISPOSALS
Freight rate increases seen on the major east-west trades in recent weeks have largely been attributed to the increased cost of fuel following the introduction of the IMO’s new low-sulphur emission regulations. However, this LinkedIn post from liner analyst Lars Jensen argues that the higher rates are more likely to be the result of a pre-Chinese New Year mini-peak. He notes that when fuel prices were last at the same level as low-sulphur fuel oil is today, which was in 2013-2014, freight rates were some $300-600 per teu higher on Asia-Europe and $600-900 per feu on the transpacific. “It is a stark contrast to the last time we saw fuel prices at these levels and does provide another indication that the carriers appear not to be successful in getting through the bunker-induced increases they were looking for yet,” he says.
Comment on this article