Transpac GRIs fail to prop up under-pressure container spot freight rates
It was a relatively flat week for pricing on the major deepsea box shipping trades, ...
WTC: RIDE THE WAVEFDX: TOP EXEC OUTPEP: TOP PERFORMER KO: STEADY YIELD AND KEY APPOINTMENTAAPL: SUPPLIER IPOCHRW: SLIGHTLY DOWNBEAT BUT UPSIDE REMAINSDHL: TOP PRIORITIESDHL: SPECULATIVE OCEAN TRADEDHL: CFO REMARKSPLD: BEATING ESTIMATESPLD: TRADING UPDATEBA: TRUMP TRADEAAPL: SUPPLY CHAIN BET
WTC: RIDE THE WAVEFDX: TOP EXEC OUTPEP: TOP PERFORMER KO: STEADY YIELD AND KEY APPOINTMENTAAPL: SUPPLIER IPOCHRW: SLIGHTLY DOWNBEAT BUT UPSIDE REMAINSDHL: TOP PRIORITIESDHL: SPECULATIVE OCEAN TRADEDHL: CFO REMARKSPLD: BEATING ESTIMATESPLD: TRADING UPDATEBA: TRUMP TRADEAAPL: SUPPLY CHAIN BET
Freight rate increases seen on the major east-west trades in recent weeks have largely been attributed to the increased cost of fuel following the introduction of the IMO’s new low-sulphur emission regulations. However, this LinkedIn post from liner analyst Lars Jensen argues that the higher rates are more likely to be the result of a pre-Chinese New Year mini-peak. He notes that when fuel prices were last at the same level as low-sulphur fuel oil is today, which was in 2013-2014, freight rates were some $300-600 per teu higher on Asia-Europe and $600-900 per feu on the transpacific. “It is a stark contrast to the last time we saw fuel prices at these levels and does provide another indication that the carriers appear not to be successful in getting through the bunker-induced increases they were looking for yet,” he says.
Comment on this article