Box lines in legal battle with South Korea’s antitrust body over fines
More than 20 liner operators look set for a protracted legal battle with the Korea ...
AMZN: APPEAL UPDATEDSV: PRESSURE BUILDS AAPL: OPENAI FUNDING INTERESTCHRW: ANOTHER INSIDER CASHES INHLAG: GRI DISCLOSUREMAERSK: HOVERING AROUND FOUR-MONTH LOWSTSLA: CHINA COMPETITIONDHL: BOLT-ON DEAL TALKAMZN: NEW ZEALAND PROJECTDHL: SURCHARGE RISKKNIN: LEGAL RISKF: 'DEI' HURDLESPLD: RATING UPDATEXOM: DISPOSALS
AMZN: APPEAL UPDATEDSV: PRESSURE BUILDS AAPL: OPENAI FUNDING INTERESTCHRW: ANOTHER INSIDER CASHES INHLAG: GRI DISCLOSUREMAERSK: HOVERING AROUND FOUR-MONTH LOWSTSLA: CHINA COMPETITIONDHL: BOLT-ON DEAL TALKAMZN: NEW ZEALAND PROJECTDHL: SURCHARGE RISKKNIN: LEGAL RISKF: 'DEI' HURDLESPLD: RATING UPDATEXOM: DISPOSALS
A good blog on the major US carriers’ “sabre-rattling” in Washington against their Gulf rivals, by the excellent no-nonsense editor of ATW, Karen Walker. She claims that the US’s ‘big three’ are appealing against the three major Gulf carriers’ attempts to break into the North American market. But she notes that they can’t have it both ways– there are risks to asking for regulatory intervention. And whatever subsidies the Gulf carriers may or may not get, the point is that they have built a product that customers like. “That’s the market at work, and that’s where US carriers should invest their time and resources, not in lunches on Capitol Hill,” she writes.
Comment on this article