UK regulator delays GXO's Wincanton takeover, due to 'competition concerns'
The UK’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA), the country’s chief competition regulator, has delayed GXO’s ...
DHL: ROBOTICSCHRW: ONE CENT CLUB UPDATECAT: RISING TRADEEXPD: TRUMP TRADE LOSER LINE: PUNISHEDMAERSK: RELIEF XPO: TRUMP TRADE WINNERCHRW: NO JOYUPS: STEADY YIELDXPO: BUILDING BLOCKSHLAG: BIG ORDERLINE: REACTIONLINE: EXPENSES AND OPERATING LEVERAGELINE: PIPELINE OF DEALS LINE: DEMAND PATTERNS LINE: LANDSCAPE
DHL: ROBOTICSCHRW: ONE CENT CLUB UPDATECAT: RISING TRADEEXPD: TRUMP TRADE LOSER LINE: PUNISHEDMAERSK: RELIEF XPO: TRUMP TRADE WINNERCHRW: NO JOYUPS: STEADY YIELDXPO: BUILDING BLOCKSHLAG: BIG ORDERLINE: REACTIONLINE: EXPENSES AND OPERATING LEVERAGELINE: PIPELINE OF DEALS LINE: DEMAND PATTERNS LINE: LANDSCAPE
A good blog on the major US carriers’ “sabre-rattling” in Washington against their Gulf rivals, by the excellent no-nonsense editor of ATW, Karen Walker. She claims that the US’s ‘big three’ are appealing against the three major Gulf carriers’ attempts to break into the North American market. But she notes that they can’t have it both ways– there are risks to asking for regulatory intervention. And whatever subsidies the Gulf carriers may or may not get, the point is that they have built a product that customers like. “That’s the market at work, and that’s where US carriers should invest their time and resources, not in lunches on Capitol Hill,” she writes.
Comment on this article