Procuring logistics services is not the same as buying paper clips
Quite – the title of this article could almost have been a quote from a ...
Last week The Loadstar ran a post: “Shippers demand innovation from their favourite 3PLs, but will they pay for it?” Behind the post was a report from SCM World which broadly concluded that “buyers speak out of two sides of their mouth”; that they “want innovative solutions and strategic thinking, but in the end ...
Teamsters union vows UPS will be 'in for a hell of a fight' over jobs cull
Shippers warned: don't under-value US exports to avoid tariffs – 'CBP will catch you'
Cancelled voyages take the sting out of spot rate declines this week
New Houthi warning to shipping as rebel group targets specific companies
K+N CEO unveils impact of US import tariffs on China-origin goods
Blanked sailings in response to falling demand 'just a stop-gap solution'
More pressure on transpacific rates as carriers bet on a China-US trade deal
CMA CGM to reflag box ship as the French carrier eyes growing Indian market
Comment on this article
Kate Vitasek
August 20, 2014 at 6:27 pmThank you for this article. I have echoed this paradox as well in many of my writings, including my book Vested Outsourcing: Five Rules that Will Transform Outsourcing.
You ask if there’s a need for anything more than a transnational relationship. In our work at the University of Tennessee we think of sourcing as a continuum and there are actually seven sourcing business models (you can download a free white paper on the Vested site – http://www.vestedway.com -Unpacking Sourcing Business Models.) Progressive companies are realizing that the key to unleashing real innovation is true collaboration based on shared-value principles and jointly agreed upon pricing models, what we have coined as a “Vested” sourcing business model. The service provider becomes a partner who is trusted and incentivized to make the relationship a win-win for the long term.
Happy to answer any questions if you have them.