Shippers cheer US FMC final rule on 'abusive' D&D practices
Shippers have welcomed the US Federal Maritime Commission’s final rule on detention and demurrage billing ...
FDX: ABOUT USPS PRIVATISATIONFDX: CCO VIEWFDX: LOWER GUIDANCE FDX: DISRUPTING AIR FREIGHTFDX: FOCUS ON KEY VERTICALFDX: LTL OUTLOOKGXO: NEW LOW LINE: NEW LOW FDX: INDUSTRIAL WOESFDX: HEALTH CHECKFDX: TRADING UPDATEWMT: GREEN WOESFDX: FREIGHT BREAK-UPFDX: WAITING FOR THE SPINHON: BREAK-UP ALLUREDSV: BREACHING SUPPORTVW: BOLT-ON DEALAMZN: TOP PICK
FDX: ABOUT USPS PRIVATISATIONFDX: CCO VIEWFDX: LOWER GUIDANCE FDX: DISRUPTING AIR FREIGHTFDX: FOCUS ON KEY VERTICALFDX: LTL OUTLOOKGXO: NEW LOW LINE: NEW LOW FDX: INDUSTRIAL WOESFDX: HEALTH CHECKFDX: TRADING UPDATEWMT: GREEN WOESFDX: FREIGHT BREAK-UPFDX: WAITING FOR THE SPINHON: BREAK-UP ALLUREDSV: BREACHING SUPPORTVW: BOLT-ON DEALAMZN: TOP PICK
Ecuadorian forwarders are fighting back against a “major trade risk” presented by what they call the “monopolisation” of the shipping sector, and unregulated container detention fees.
Speaking to The Loadstar at Fiata’s World Congress, president of Latin American forwarding association Alacat, Galo Molina Aguilar, claimed shippers were being “taken advantage of”.
“Not only are the carriers taking advantage of shippers by collecting fees for the detention of containers, they are failing to invoice separately for these fees,” said Mr Aguilar.
He said such fees were rarely itemised in carriers’ invoices, while the reduction in number of lines had left the incumbents with even less incentive to invest in customer service.
“Consolidation among the carriers has only exacerbated this problem by creating a monopoly, which is creating a major trade risk,”
Detention fees are leveraged by shipping lines when containers are held for longer than agreed to under contracts with shippers. Mr Aguilar said he had “no problem” with this practice, noting that the detention was not the fault of the carrier but rather a customs issue.
“The problem is the lack of regulation surrounding how these fees are applied and invoiced, and the lack of limits on what they can charge for detention,” he continued.
“They are exploiting problems, and this exploitation ultimately hits customers as it increases the costs of the goods being shipped.”
According to Mr Aguilar, the Ecuadorian government has agreed to take action on the issue and is pushing through legislation to regulate these costs.
He said international freight forwarder association Fiata was working with Alacat on recommendations it would share with other governments on how best to limit these costs.
“We’re pleased with the Ecuadorian government’s actions to alter these carrier practices, but more is required,” said Mr Aguilar, who runs forwarder Planet Cargo. “This has to happen – has to be solved – at a global level, it cannot only happen at regional levels if it is to have any hope in working.”
The US Federal Maritime Commission is also undertaking an in-depth investigation into demurrage and detention fees applied in the US following a series of complaints from shippers and freight forwarders.
Comment on this article
LawrenceTeh
October 16, 2018 at 2:56 amListed Freight Forwarder also taking advantage of shipper / consignee when there’s opportunity for them to do so.
Ale Pasetti
October 16, 2018 at 6:58 pmSuch as, LawrenceTeh? Can you expand a bit on that? Thanks, Ale.
Hariesh
October 17, 2018 at 12:04 pmWhat a coincidence.. Just today I had posted an article about how demurrage, detention and port charges work (https://shippingandfreightresource.com/demurrage-detention-and-port-charges/) and in that there was a question whether demurrage and detention charges were justified..
It will be very difficult to find a mediator here as both parties (shipping line & merchant) have their own agenda as regards cost savings/cost recovery..