UK eyes expanding its ETS to deepsea shipping – closing EU loophole
A loophole allowing ocean carriers to dodge ETS charges via a port call in the ...
FDX: ABOUT USPS PRIVATISATIONFDX: CCO VIEWFDX: LOWER GUIDANCE FDX: DISRUPTING AIR FREIGHTFDX: FOCUS ON KEY VERTICALFDX: LTL OUTLOOKGXO: NEW LOW LINE: NEW LOW FDX: INDUSTRIAL WOESFDX: HEALTH CHECKFDX: TRADING UPDATEWMT: GREEN WOESFDX: FREIGHT BREAK-UPFDX: WAITING FOR THE SPINHON: BREAK-UP ALLUREDSV: BREACHING SUPPORTVW: BOLT-ON DEALAMZN: TOP PICK
FDX: ABOUT USPS PRIVATISATIONFDX: CCO VIEWFDX: LOWER GUIDANCE FDX: DISRUPTING AIR FREIGHTFDX: FOCUS ON KEY VERTICALFDX: LTL OUTLOOKGXO: NEW LOW LINE: NEW LOW FDX: INDUSTRIAL WOESFDX: HEALTH CHECKFDX: TRADING UPDATEWMT: GREEN WOESFDX: FREIGHT BREAK-UPFDX: WAITING FOR THE SPINHON: BREAK-UP ALLUREDSV: BREACHING SUPPORTVW: BOLT-ON DEALAMZN: TOP PICK
Shipping companies should start preparing now for the FuelEU Maritime regulation, as the deadline for submitting plans to monitor fuel type and consumption looms, warned the co-MD of maritime technology specialist OceanScore, Albrecht Grell.
FuelEU is part of the European Union’s Fit for 55 package, aiming to increase the use of renewable and low-carbon fuels in the shipping sector.
It demands that energy used by ships of more than 5,000 gross tonnes reduces each year, compared with a 2020 baseline: from 2% next year, to 80% by 2050.
Mr Grell warned that penalties for non-compliance would be issued on the document of compliance (DoC), rather than on the ‘polluter pays’ principle.
The size of the penalties incurred from FuelEU Maritime will depend on fuel mix, trading pattern and the amount by which a vessel misses the target, according to Friederike Hesse, co-founder and MD of maritime carbon solutions software platform zero44.
“The cost is significant, and will get more significant over time,” she told The Loadstar.
OceanScore warned today that the 31 August deadline for shipping companies to submit a monitoring plan that tracks fuel type and consumption for each EU voyage for each vessel, as required by FuelEU, is fast approaching.
And Ms Hesse told The Loadstar the nearness of FuelEU implementation could mean stakeholders won’t have widely available access to alternative fuels.
“Green fuel options in 2025 will be limited, so pooling strategies, forwarding of penalties, etc, will be important strategies for shipping companies,” she said.
And, she added, this emissions regulation will add an additional cost to those shipping into, out of, or between, EU ports to the EU ETS already in effect this year.
The EU ETS puts a tax on carbon emissions, meaning any reduction of emissions by burning less fuel is incentivised, such as by slow steaming, hull cleaning, etc.
FuelEU, however, relates to the quality of the fuel burnt.
“[FuelEU] really wants to make the industry invest in alternative low-GHG fuels. Simply burning less fuels is not enough, because the penalty is on the GHG intensity of the fuel mix: the emissions per unit of energy consumed,” explained Ms Hesse.”
And the two new regulations, especially by 2026 when the EU ETS is fully phased in, will put immense pressure on shipping to prioritise investment in green fuels and zero- emission ships.
“If you don’t comply or act you will be punished twice, but if you do comply and act you will also benefit twice. So, both regulations enforce each other,” said Ms Hesse.
Comment on this article