Forwarders will gain as Europe accelerates global trade agreements, says DHL
Opportunities are in the offing for forwarders and logistics operators, as the EU and the ...
WTC: ANOTHER DIFFICULT WEEK CHRW: NEW PRODUCT LAUNCHDSV: LEADING THE DROP RXO: CRATERINGDSV: WHAT TO LIKEDSV: BULLISH BAMZN: 'AI EDGE'HD: HERE IS HOW IT LOOKSAMZN: REG RISKMAERSK: MOST HARMED
WTC: ANOTHER DIFFICULT WEEK CHRW: NEW PRODUCT LAUNCHDSV: LEADING THE DROP RXO: CRATERINGDSV: WHAT TO LIKEDSV: BULLISH BAMZN: 'AI EDGE'HD: HERE IS HOW IT LOOKSAMZN: REG RISKMAERSK: MOST HARMED
Brooking has published an interesting article on China’s Belt & Road Initiative – a not particularly transparent project. As it notes, the BRI is primarily a programme to fund infrastructure, with about two-thirds of financing – some $50-$100bn each year – going to power and transport.
A 2019 World Bank study looked at the transport projects along the overland and maritime routes, concluding there were benefits to recipient countries and the world, if transport costs were reduced through improved infrastructure. But it also pointed out that policy impediments were greater than infrastructure impediments.
Brooking notes that the US response to BRI would be more effective if it looked to trade agreements, streamlined red tape and “dialled down the anti-China rhetoric”.
For uninterrupted access, sign in or sign up to The Daily News, Premium or The Loadstar Enterprise Plan.
Comment on this article