Strikes end, but delays continue at Australian ports
Australian freight forwarder International Cargo Express (ICE) has warned of backlogs at Australian ports affected ...
WTC: LOOKING FOR DIRECTIONTSLA: SERIOUS STUFFF: STOP HEREDSV: BOUNCING BACK HD: NEW DELIVERY PARTNERSKNX: SOLID UPDATE PG: WORST CASE AVOIDEDKNX: KEEP ON TRUCKING GM: UPGRADEPLD: BEST PERFORMER AAPL: INDONESIA BAN AAPL: FALLINGMAERSK: ANOTHER HITHLAG: NOTHING CHANGEDZIM: MORE TROUBLE FOR THE SPECULATORSCHRW: UPGRADES FROM THE BEAR CAMP
WTC: LOOKING FOR DIRECTIONTSLA: SERIOUS STUFFF: STOP HEREDSV: BOUNCING BACK HD: NEW DELIVERY PARTNERSKNX: SOLID UPDATE PG: WORST CASE AVOIDEDKNX: KEEP ON TRUCKING GM: UPGRADEPLD: BEST PERFORMER AAPL: INDONESIA BAN AAPL: FALLINGMAERSK: ANOTHER HITHLAG: NOTHING CHANGEDZIM: MORE TROUBLE FOR THE SPECULATORSCHRW: UPGRADES FROM THE BEAR CAMP
Two fascinating issues are unfolding concurrently on the US east coast. While the Commonwealth of Virginia wrestles over which corporate entity might operate its cargo terminals in the future, the powerful International Longshoremen’s Association says an east coast port strike is now “likely” after contract negotiations with employers broke down this week.
At a public meeting on Wednesday state officials offered glimpses of two additional outside proposals to run the Port of Virginia – one from private equity firm the Carlyle Group and the other from Deutsche Bank’s infrastructure investment arm RREEF. They will square up against each other and APM Terminals, which initiated this contest when it made an unsolicited approach announced by the port in May.
But, as the Virginian Pilot reported in this article, the buzz about the labour situation – which could mean the first strike to affect ports from Maine to Texas since 1977 – left some meeting participants compulsively checking smartphones for updates.
Comment on this article