Shipyards won't be able to meet future demand for greener vessels
“If you look at the market right now, it is easy to take the position ...
Fuel prices vary, of course, but based on the economics put forward in Seatrade Maritime, it looks as if scrubbers may be a poor investment if early assessments of the price spread between high-sulphur bunker fuel and the low-sulphur version are correct. As the article notes, “should the fuel spread drop to just $40, there would be no business case for a 20MW scrubber, while a $100 spread would see a payback period of less than two years”.
What is striking about this particular brand of economic argument, however, is the lack of consideration over where the burden of the costs fall.
Scrubbers require investment from shipping lines, whose customers will then benefit from lower fuel costs. Those lines which don’t opt for scrubbers, are passing the higher fuel bills straight to their customers – who may instead choose a carrier which has made the investment.
And that’s an entirely different economic argument for the case of scrubbers vs high cost fuel.
'Mass-casualty incident' as Maersk box ship destroys Baltimore bridge
Shock for CMA CGM as a deputy CEO decides to quit
Diversions from Red Sea proving a real ‘silver lining’ for carriers
Could the Dali have suffered a power loss before bridge crash?
Asia-Europe carriers revise FAK rates in fight to rein in revenue erosion
Strike paralysing Finnish ports extended after talks collapse
Dali cargo owners face massive costs if general average is declared
Alex Lennane
email: [email protected]
mobile: +44 7879 334 389
During August 2023, please contact
Alex Whiteman
email: [email protected]
Alessandro Pasetti
email: [email protected]
mobile: +44 7402 255 512
Comment on this article