Chittagong's PCT gives carriers new Bangladesh options
Bangladesh’s port of Chittagong’s recently inaugurated Patenga Container Terminal (PCT) is ramping up its operations, ...
The British International Freight Association (BIFA) has criticised the proposed introduction of a new fuel surcharge by shipping lines in advance of the 202o global sulphur cap, describing it as “unjustified” and arguably “blatant profiteering”.
This week Maersk Line announced plans to introduce a new bunker adjustment factor (BAF) surcharge for 1 January 2019, a year ahead of the new laws reducing the sulphur content of shipping fuel.
Depending on the fuel price at the time, this could see the cost of shipping a 40ft container on the Asia -North ...
Crew saved as MSC box ship, hit by 'monsoon' off Indian coast, sinks
MSC Elsa 3 sinking – now the 'blame game' begins
After DSV 'cuts the cake' on Schenker acquisition, time for redundancies?
New services and reinstated blanked sailings boost transpacific capacity
Congestion fear as US west coast ports brace for transpacific cargo surge
$2.1bn E2open purchase will 'catapult WiseTech into a different dimension'
Houthis claim Red Sea safe for box ships not calling at port of Haifa
News in Brief Podcast | Week 21 | GRIs and European port congestion
Shippers hold their breath as Trump appeals court ruling that tariffs are illegal
Bad news for shippers as wave of transpacific rate increases continues
US importers stockpiling goods to avert autumn shortages amid tariff chaos
Shippers brace for rate rise as smart phones expected to drive air cargo market
Comment on this article
Gary Ferrulli
September 19, 2018 at 3:13 pmTwo comments; profiteering, is that what carriers have done in last decade? or losing more than $20. Billion and cutting rates by 50% (Alphaliner report) in last 20 years? The fuel costs started upward journey in first quarter 2017 and by now have increased by 60%, yet surcharges introduced in July 2018 with huge list of exempted shippers. All in rates were opposed by shippers for decades, they wanted transparency to see if fuel went up, they could see why. If terminals went up due to labor, they could see why. If currency goes up, they can see and calculate. Now they want all in rates – why?
They have been used to lower rates for over a decade, dealing with an industry that has lost money for the past decade. They clamor for transparency and notification, here there are months of notification. So when they see this they complain as it isn’t their norm – lower and lower rates. Has nothing to do with cost of service. The one real complaint they can make is- who will it apply to, and as importantly, who won;t have to pay it? Carriers are notorious for creating charges and gri’s while writing thousands of contracts that exempt the gri’s and surcharges. That is a legitimate complaint from the small and medium sized shippers, they bear the brunt of the additional costs. It’s the carrier decision making process that has created this reality and educated a generation or two of shippers that rates and charges only go down. Anything else is profiteering.