Cargo thieves active during Memorial Day weekend, firms warn
It’s a holiday weekend – and the thieves have got an eye on your cargo, ...
US politicians seem set on the requirement that every US-bound container should be scanned at the export port prior to loading on the departing vessel, a notion that is absurd to anyone with even a passing acquaintance of the practicalities of international container transportation.
This week the US House of Representatives subcommittee on Homeland Security offered up to Congress the revised draft of its SMART Port Security Act, itself a reauthorisation of the 2007 SAFE Port Act.
The crucial element here is ...
European port congestion now at five-to-six days, and getting worse
Keep our news independent, by supporting The Loadstar
'Cargo collision' expected as transpacific capacity tightens and rates rise
Houthis declare blockade of port of Haifa – 'vessels calling will be targets'
Another CMA CGM vessel heading for Suez Canal – 'to mitigate schedule delay'
Ocean rates rise after tariff pause acts as 'starting gun' for more front-loading
Navigating supply chain trends in 2025: efficiency, visibility, and adaptability
News in Brief Podcast | Week 20 | 90-day countdown, India and Pakistan
Demand for transpac airfreight capacity returning – but 'it's not ecommerce-driven'
ONE opts for South Korean newbuilds to avoid hefty US port fees
CMA CGM will carry on investing after 'solid' Q1, despite unclear outlook
Air cargo forwarders stick to spot rates – a long-term contract would be 'foolish'
Comment on this article
A.J. Dutari
August 24, 2012 at 3:43 pmUS Congress Lawmakers propose X-Ray scanning of all containers inbound to US ports, prior to loading on ships. Goodbye to US Trade & Competitiveness ! Cost cutting goes against security. One DHS overseer subcommittee on air freight accepts risk based approach ramdom checking, while another on sea cargo wants 100% screening. Who pays for this? A Coherent Mission Approach Policy is required. Deadline approaches.