dreamstime_s_39420278
© Robert Hyrons

Debate about the highly contested Jones Act seems to be cyclical. And its time has come around again. But this is an argument not often seen, and it’s interesting. The author here argues that the act subsidises shipbuilding and maritime labour – which the US would have to do anyway, to ensure it had access to ships and crew in times of need. It could, of course, ‘lease’ them from the commercial market – another subsidy. Or as he puts ...

Please Register

To continue reading, please login or register for full access to our free content
Loadstar subscriber
New Loadstar subscriber REGISTER

Comment on this article


You must be logged in to post a comment.
  • Martyn Benson

    May 19, 2021 at 12:49 pm

    Free enterprise shipping and academics rarely have much confluence when it comes to real world practices.
    If the Jones Act is so worthy and credible, why is the US merchant fleet so small in comparison with the volume of US trade?

Topics

Jones Act