Where will the freighters go as capacity shifts from tariff-hit China-US lane?
Cargo airlines are scrabbling to find new markets as capacity becomes available following the end ...
A 27% relative discrepancy in the way aircraft load factors are calculated is a “terrible miss” for the industry, it was claimed today.
Last year’s Project Selfie, which re-examined the way load factors are calculated, revealed that, in some cases, recording utilisation by weight alone significantly mis-represents the air cargo industry.
“The gap between the two calculations is very large,” said Niall van de Wouw, architect of Project Selfie.
“Imagine if a factory had such different utilisation rates – it would make or ...
Keep our news independent, by supporting The Loadstar
Container spot rates diverge: to Europe still falling, but firmer to the US
Volume surge and an early peak season? 'Don't celebrate too soon,' warning
Hapag-Lloyd won't take bookings if port congestion leaves cargo stranded
Ecommerce likely the front-runner in resurge of transpacific trade after deal
China-US trade tariff pause could drive a rebound for transpacific rates
Service chaos from trade ban with India a problem for Pakistan shippers
Airfreight rates ex-China 'loss-making', but hopes of a trade deal stay high
Comment on this article
CargoMan
September 25, 2018 at 4:50 pmSo, how is dynamic load factor calculated? Is there a preset formula?
Alex Lennane
September 25, 2018 at 5:53 pmHello CargoMan, There is a bit more detail in previous posts: https://theloadstar.com/open-letter-iata-lies-damned-lies-loadfactor-statistics/ and https://theloadstar.com/project-selfie-cargo-airlines-can-see-measure/
Or you can email the architect of this initiative at selfie@support.useclive.com.
Thank you for your interest.
Alex