Maersk sues, but Ever Given Suez delays not down to us, says Evergreen
Taiwan container line Evergreen has rejected a claim by Maersk that it carries joint responsibility ...
An op-ed piece from Splash24/7 on the need for ports to begin drawing up plans for ultra-large container vessels (ULCVs) should they become a casualty. Among the sources in Hamburg that The Loadstar has spoken with, there is a consensus that both the port and China Shipping were lucky the Indian Ocean Elbe grounding incident wasn’t far worse. It was still bad enough, with estimates that it cost the Chinese carrier $20m, with 12 of Rotterdam’s largest tugs brought in to help drag it off the river bed – some of which were hired out at $20,000 an hour. The stakes get higher as the ships get bigger: “CSCL is one of the most valuable customers of the port of Hamburg. Losing this carrier because of physical limitations of the port would be a severe financial and economical setback for the entire region.”
WestJet will 'disrupt' Canada with three 737Fs, but rivals aren't scared
West coast ports suffering as US container imports plunge by 37%
Cost-cutting FedEx Express to retire MD-11s for B767s and 777s
First shipper uses new land-air corridor ex-India for Bangladesh exports
The 'mother of all BAFs' looms for shippers as green targets advance
Carriers turn their gaze back to scrubbers as voyage results tumble
Maersk idles more ships while NOOs see a rebound in demand
Billund sees launch of Maersk Air China link – 'a start-up on steroids'
CMA CGM eyes car-carrier market boom as liners are ready to invest
DSV buys in Arizona to boost services and cross-border LatAm trade
Shippers advised to give strike-hit port of Hamburg a miss
The parcel empires strike back as smaller players take stock
Comment on this article
Jim WalshMarch 25, 2016 at 4:58 am
Bigger is better for who? For the cargo owner? Ports? Canals? Consumers? For the environment? With the price of bunkers more than halved mega ships can now bypass the Suez canal, save thousands of dollars on fuel and take a few days longer to reach port. With massive ships come greater risks – fire fighting, salvage, pollution response. How do we respond. Who covers the costs of preparation and response? Sustainable? More feeder ships moving from the hub ports to transship those boxes to end user ports. More emissions per VGM certified container. Ports creating ever larger footprints to benefit who? All stakeholders need to be at the table to ensure sustainable innovation and progress.