Ripples from bridge collapse will give importers a headache
From a container supply chain perspective, the effect from this morning’s incident will probably not ...
MAERSK: OPPORTUNISTIC UPGRADETSLA: GETTING OUTDSV: DOWN BELOW KEY LEVELLINE: DOWN TO ALL-TIME LOWS AMZN: DEI HURDLESAAPL: DEI RECOMMENDATIONAAPL: INNOVATIONF: MAKING MONEY IN CHINAMAERSK: THE DAY AFTERDHL: NEW DEALGXO: NEW PARTNERSHIPKNIN: MATCHING PREVIOUS LOWSEXPD: VALUE AND LEGAL RISKMAERSK: DOWN SHE GOES
MAERSK: OPPORTUNISTIC UPGRADETSLA: GETTING OUTDSV: DOWN BELOW KEY LEVELLINE: DOWN TO ALL-TIME LOWS AMZN: DEI HURDLESAAPL: DEI RECOMMENDATIONAAPL: INNOVATIONF: MAKING MONEY IN CHINAMAERSK: THE DAY AFTERDHL: NEW DEALGXO: NEW PARTNERSHIPKNIN: MATCHING PREVIOUS LOWSEXPD: VALUE AND LEGAL RISKMAERSK: DOWN SHE GOES
The port of Virginia has big ambitions. It has a plan to dredge its main shipping channels as well as widen them – giving it bigger channels than the port of Los Angeles. It would cost between $266m and $324m, but this article from the The Virginia Pilot doesn’t note what the port’s ultimate ambition are, or what benefits it could definitely bring, in an era when the big shipping alliances hold all the cards.
Maersk and MSC fire first shots in new freight rate war on Asia-Europe trades
US port strike called off as ILA and USMX reach 'tentative' agreement
Cosco share price falls after US lists carrier as a Chinese 'military asset'
$7bn infrastructure project heads list of expansion plans for India's busy ports
Alliance reshuffle will increase box ship shortage as carriers hunt 'buffers'
Evergreen staff bonuses soar again, as carrier profits triple
Shipping Australia calls for end to 'disruptive' port strikes
Comment on this article