Customs teams forced to step up war against drug smugglers
Border forces around the world are warning that despite making more drugs finds at container ...
A comparison of Belgian and Dutch ports. Rotterdam is busiest, with 12.3m teu throughput in 2016, but is growing more slowly than Antwerp – 1.2% last year against 4% at the Belgian container port, which handled 10m teu.
“…Antwerp reaped the full benefits of the reshuffling in strategic alliances in liner shipping, including an increase in Far East service calls,” notes the article. It looks at how the alliance shifts have impacted the ports – and gives a comprehensive overview of the numbers involved.
Carriers still need another 400,000 teu to maintain services
CMA CGM commits to no job cuts for a year, following Bolloré deal
Transpacific freight rates – it’s all about 'who blinks first'
Hapag-Lloyd in choppy water as volatile market sinks profits
Stock sinks, losses mount and guidance weighs heavy for Zim
Rate hikes eclipse Red Sea diversion costs, boosting carrier profits
Alex Lennane
email: [email protected]
mobile: +44 7879 334 389
During August 2023, please contact
Alex Whiteman
email: [email protected]
Alessandro Pasetti
email: [email protected]
mobile: +44 7402 255 512
Comment on this article
Dawid Lisowski
February 17, 2021 at 9:32 amport of Rotterdam – especially maasvlakte 2 is so much modern than Antwerp