Australia follows US and Canada in tightening airfreight security
Australia has joined Canada and the US in beefing up airfreight security, according to Air ...
DSV: STAR OF THE WEEKDSV: FLAWLESS EXECUTIONKNIN: ANOTHER LOWWTC: TAKING PROFITMAERSK: HAMMEREDZIM: PAINFUL END OF STRIKE STLA: PAYOUT RISKAMZN: GOING NOWHEREAMZN: SEASONAL PEAK PREPARATIONSJBHT: LVL PARTNERSHIPHD: MACRO READING AND DISCONNECTSTLA: 'FALLING LEAVES'STLA: THE STEEP DROP
DSV: STAR OF THE WEEKDSV: FLAWLESS EXECUTIONKNIN: ANOTHER LOWWTC: TAKING PROFITMAERSK: HAMMEREDZIM: PAINFUL END OF STRIKE STLA: PAYOUT RISKAMZN: GOING NOWHEREAMZN: SEASONAL PEAK PREPARATIONSJBHT: LVL PARTNERSHIPHD: MACRO READING AND DISCONNECTSTLA: 'FALLING LEAVES'STLA: THE STEEP DROP
Airlines which agreed to pay out to Australia’s competition commission after being accused of operating a cartel over fuel surcharges may be regretting it. A Federal Court of Australia decision has found that Australia had failed to prove that airlines broke the law in the domestic market, instead colluding at the point of origin. The case was heard after Air New Zealand and Garuda refused to settle with the competition commission. The decision could have implications for future cross-border cartel cases, according to this article – but airlines which have already paid will have no way to claw back the A$98m of fines already meted out.
Comment on this article