dreamstime_l_278538749
© Robert Hyrons

The forwarding industry has questioned IATA’s decision to require ’potentially ruinous’ financial securities for some companies wishing to use CASS, its settlement system, as exclusively revealed by The Loadstar yesterday.

New offices, new company names, or new locations – even for established forwarders – could result ...

To read this article you need to subscribe.

Help us to continue to invest in award-winning independent journalism. For an introductory offer of just £70 a year, or £10 per month, get access to all our daily news stories and opinion. If you are already a registered user, please login below with your current account's email and password to subscribe. If you are not registered and want to subscribe, please register below to subscribe.
Current subscriber
New subscriber

Comment on this article


You must be logged in to post a comment.
  • Norbert Liebich

    July 17, 2024 at 2:18 pm

    CASS is holding the forwarder at random. One does not get any credit facility in South Africa from any airline without a bank guarantee for the facility you require from that specific airline.
    Should you enjoy credit facilities with all the airlines you are working with, you most likely you have bank guarantees of at least 5 fold your monthly turnover in place. In addition you have to furnish IATA with a bank guarantee. Absolutely unreasonable.

  • Richard Adams Jr

    July 17, 2024 at 2:36 pm

    Iata CASS is acting like a bank which they are not! Reason why they were forced to leave Brazil! They faced legal action from some freight forwarders and condemned to stop with these practices because judged understood they were acting like finantial instituitions and they were not. They do not exists in Brazil as an instituition and invoices are generated outside the country. And those freight forwarders kept they rights not to present to them what they were asking.