Shipyards won't be able to meet future demand for greener vessels
“If you look at the market right now, it is easy to take the position ...
Fuel prices vary, of course, but based on the economics put forward in Seatrade Maritime, it looks as if scrubbers may be a poor investment if early assessments of the price spread between high-sulphur bunker fuel and the low-sulphur version are correct. As the article notes, “should the fuel spread drop to just $40, there would be no business case for a 20MW scrubber, while a $100 spread would see a payback period of less than two years”.
What is striking about this particular brand of economic argument, however, is the lack of consideration over where the burden of the costs fall.
Scrubbers require investment from shipping lines, whose customers will then benefit from lower fuel costs. Those lines which don’t opt for scrubbers, are passing the higher fuel bills straight to their customers – who may instead choose a carrier which has made the investment.
And that’s an entirely different economic argument for the case of scrubbers vs high cost fuel.
Etail by air – here to stay or on a short shelf life?
HMM sees opportunities in Hapag-Lloyd’s exit from THE Alliance
The rise and rise of China's ecommerce platforms
Legal battle heats up over 'unseaworthy' and 'reckless' MV Dali
Increasing scrutiny could stall rise of ecommerce platforms, as TikTok faces US ban
DSV chief reticent on Schenker: the focus on growing market share
Another strong month for US ports as container flows continue to rise
MSC redeploys 'Israel-linked' box ships away from Persian Gulf
Alex Lennane
email: [email protected]
mobile: +44 7879 334 389
During August 2023, please contact
Alex Whiteman
email: [email protected]
Alessandro Pasetti
email: [email protected]
mobile: +44 7402 255 512
Comment on this article