Older freighters look set for the scrap heap as capacity oversupply looms
Aged freighters are destined for scrappage, with the raft of new orders set to hit ...
Asia-Europe shippers should “brace themselves” for an extensive round of blanked sailings in the final weeks of the year, and a subsequent plunge in service integrity, as ocean carriers attempt to address “endemic overcapacity”, according to shipping analyst SeaIntel.
Voiding sailings in the slack season is not a new strategy for carriers, but SeaIntel expects “a large number” this year as the supply-demand ratio significantly worsens with the delivery of more ultra large container vessels (ULCVs) that can only be deployed on Asia-Europe tradelanes.
In 2013, there were 115 blanked sailings between Asia and Europe, according to SeaIntel’s analysis, equating to 21,100teu a week. To illustrate the magnitude of the service cull, the analyst calculated that if the blanked voyages had been taken in one hit, there would have been no sailings to Europe for an entire three-week period.
The Loadstar constantly receives complaints from shippers disgruntled at the lack of advice and notice of blanked sailings, and many view the problem as far greater than schedule reliability and port congestion combined.
Kuehne + Nagel’s intra-Europe trade manager, Helge Neumann-Lezius, told The Loadstar earlier in the year that blanked sailings gave his control tower operation a “major headache”.
“My biggest complaint is the lack of notice,” he said. “We sometimes only get a few days’ warning [of a blanked sailing] from the carriers, and this can put massive pressure on the supply chain.”
And if the world’s largest sea freight forwarder experiences communication problems with carriers over cancelled sailings, it follows that others will be suffering in the same manner, or worse. So far this year SeaIntel has recorded 33 blanked sailings between Asia and North Europe and 27 between Asia and the Mediterranean, while forwarders told The Loadstar that both the CKYH-E alliance and the joint CMA CGM/MSC service have cancelled sailings to North Europe this week.
And The Loadstar understands that the CKYH-E is to blank its NE7 service for weeks 45 and 47, with the G6 alliance voiding Loop 7 also for week 47.
Most of the information on the blanking of sailings seems to be distributed on a “need-to-know” basis and is not always shown promptly on the carriers’ websites, making it very difficult for shippers to be confident about arrival times for cargo.
However, blanking sailings is the only instrument – however blunt – in the carriers’ tool box that has proven to effectively address overcapacity.
And if it makes shippers nervous about getting space on ships, then that is in the interest of carriers which have seen spot rates between Asia and North Europe plummet to around $700 per teu over past weeks, and are attempting to roll out general rate increases of around $1,000 per teu at the beginning of November, against a backcloth of soft demand and contract rates for 2015 being negotiated.
Meanwhile, as we were writing this article Maersk Line announced that it intends to blank four sailings of its Asia – Europe AE6 loop – weeks 43, 45, 48 and 51.
WestJet will 'disrupt' Canada with three 737Fs, but rivals aren't scared
West coast ports suffering as US container imports plunge by 37%
Cost-cutting FedEx Express to retire MD-11s for B767s and 777s
The 'mother of all BAFs' looms for shippers as green targets advance
Carriers turn their gaze back to scrubbers as voyage results tumble
Maersk idles more ships while NOOs see a rebound in demand
Billund sees launch of Maersk Air China link – 'a start-up on steroids'
First shipper uses new land-air corridor ex-India for Bangladesh exports
CMA CGM eyes car-carrier market boom as liners are ready to invest
DSV buys in Arizona to boost services and cross-border LatAm trade
Shippers advised to give strike-hit port of Hamburg a miss
The parcel empires strike back as smaller players take stock
Comment on this article
Ricky FormanOctober 21, 2014 at 1:07 pm
Shippers should “brace themselves” for the Nov+Dec capacity withdrawal but it should be noted they are not just the innocent victim in all of this. The carrier/shipper relationship is essentially non existent resulting in a tug of war of rates throughout the year. If contract rates were agreed at more realistic levels, Carriers wouldn’t have to take such drastic measures in the spot market to subsidise their short fall. Carriers actions of ordering new tonnage have further contributed to the issue, so its fair to say both parties are as bad as each other. Until the market/industry realises there is another way of doing business (via hedging rate risk) it will continue to waste each others valuable time and resources and nothing will change.