Box lines scramble to secure new containership orders
The containership orderbook ratio now stands at just over 4m teu, or 27% of the ...
Let me begin today’s column with some special praise for five of my industry sources, whom I’ve nicknamed Mr Big, an industry executive (North America); T Island, supply chain specialist (APAC); Oasis, industry finance veteran (Europe); The Doctor, a freight forwarding innovator (North America); and Sunshine (Europe), a freight forwarding veteran.
With 127 years’ market experience between them, what they also have in common is that, little by little and from very different perspectives, they have added immense value to the debate surrounding ...
January strike at US east and Gulf coast ports now inevitable, say forwarders
Shippers eye alternatives as Indian port workers prepare for 'indefinite' strike
Indian air cargo really flying, powered by a booming ecommerce market
The Red Sea crisis and its impact on containership deployment
Trump tariffs on China a boost for exporters in Vietnam, Thailand and South Korea
A new trade war with US would threaten China’s 'historic' airfreight boom
Happy new year for transpac liners as shippers front-load to beat tariffs
Maersk orders 20 more dual-fuel newbuildings – on course for fleet renewal by 2030
Comment on this article
chas deller
November 05, 2018 at 2:34 pmAnother excellent and well presented view point.
Ale Pasetti
November 05, 2018 at 9:15 pmMany thanks, Chas. Much appreciated!
Gary Ferrulli
November 05, 2018 at 3:34 pmWhile there is no question about 2018 being a less than stellar year for carriers, primarily due to their own poor decisions on 2018 and 2018/2019 Contracts,
you seem to take the Asia/Europe market as the only one in the world. It is
of course extremely important, but so is the TP and Intra-Asia. Are those two,
which are larger than Asia/Europe, with their very high spot market rates,
enough to offset the Asia/Europe issues? We’ll know in February/March not
next week.
Ale Pasetti
November 05, 2018 at 9:14 pmYou are right, it’s better elsewhere, but I opted for “it does not look good elsewhere, as global growth projections come under strain.” In other words, I have normalised the rates. So, it doesn’t look good anywhere, given the input costs and mix, IMO. Thanks, GFERRULLI.
Ale Pasetti
November 08, 2018 at 7:17 am(8 Nov) ON A ROLL: Hapag Q3 out, 10% ebitda beat, €0.64 quarterly EPS vs ~ €0.40 expected; 9M EPS @ ~ €0.03 (9M 2017: €0.05). Still, ROIC @ 3.2% vs ~ 8% WACC, net debt unchanged @ €5.6bn, while FcF is lower y-o-y, but healthy, as it keeps a lid on staff costs, down 7.3% below half a billion euros y-o-y.