dreamstime_m_66132007
© Vchalup

Today’s “absolutely nuts” container shipping market will spur contract renegotiations, as rates and minimum quantity commitments (MQCs) are questioned, according to Patrik Berglund, CEO of Xeneta. 

“Disruption has been constant for the past six years. It’s one thing after another,” said Mr Burgland. 

And as a recent Loadstar ...

To read this article you need to subscribe.

Help us to continue to invest in award-winning independent journalism. For an introductory offer of just £70 a year, or £10 per month, get access to all our daily news stories and opinion. If you are already a registered user, please login below with your current account's email and password to subscribe. If you are not registered and want to subscribe, please register below to subscribe.
Current subscriber
New subscriber

Comment on this article


You must be logged in to post a comment.
  • Makarand Shirgaokar

    April 18, 2025 at 9:04 am

    This piece does a great job of capturing the current turbulence in the container shipping landscape. With macroeconomic headwinds, geopolitical tensions, and persistent supply-demand imbalances, traditional contract models are being tested. Shippers are caught between volatile spot markets and rigid MQC-based contracts, leading to growing pressure for renegotiations. Carriers, on the other hand, are resorting to surcharges and GRIs to prevent rates from bottoming out, which only adds to the uncertainty. As we head into what’s traditionally contract renewal season, flexibility and real-time market visibility will be essential for both shippers and carriers to navigate the months ahead.

  • Rajeev Kathuria

    May 11, 2025 at 3:27 pm

    Surcharges are like “speed breaker” on the straight fall is an intriguing one. The idea seems to be to slow or control a precipitous drop in base freight rates, much like a physical speed breaker controls the velocity of a vehicle. A mechanism like this would help stabilize the market by preventing rapid downward adjustments that might destabilize both carrier margins and overall service reliability. Think of it as a regulatory or industry-standard safeguard—a controlled deceleration of rate changes —that could be structured, for instance, as a rule preventing base rates from decreasing faster than a fixed percentage within a given period.