NYK Line sells 'costly' Nippon Cargo Airlines to ANA
NYK Line has bucked the flying liner trend, becoming the first shipping line to ditch ...
Japan’s MOL has begun legal action against the shipbuilder of the ill-fated 8,100teu MOL Comfort, which sank in July last year.
The company has filed a claim in the Tokyo District Court for compensation from Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (MHI) for the cost of having to strengthen the hulls of six sister ships, after inspections by ClassNK found “buckling-type deformations” on their bottom shell plates.
If the claim succeeds there could be significant implications for thousands of other claims related to the 2008-built ship, which was loaded with 4,382 containers. It broke its back and split in two in adverse weather last summer, about 200 nautical miles off the Yemen coast while en route from Singapore to Jeddah.
Salvage attempts were made to secure and tow both the bow and aft sections of the ship but both sank.
The MOL Comfort is the largest containership to be recorded as a total loss, with Japanese insurers holding the bulk of the $66m hull and machinery policy – however, the cargo loss is likely to greatly exceed that figure.
Cargo insurance underwriters normally work on an average value of a container’s contents as being around $50,000, but given that the MOL Comfort, on its headhaul voyage from Asia, would have been packed with high-value consumer goods for European markets, the real value will have been much greater.
Moreover, the hi-tech contents would normally have been insured at sale, rather than cost, price – thus the latest estimates are that claims could easily exceed $500m.
One Japanese electronics giant is reported to have lost a consignment of six containers with goods destined for customers in Europe and Russia with a total financial interest of approximately $450,000 per box. Plus, in order to fulfil its contract the manufacturer upgraded factory output and the replacement stock was shipped by air freight to various European destinations, at considerable expense.
This company would not have been alone in doing whatever it took to ensure their supply chain was not broken as a result of the demise of the MOL Comfort, so cargo claims working their way through the offices of underwriters will not only be for the value of the lost goods, but also for consequential loss.
The MOL Comfort, together with its sister vessels, were the first containerships classified by ClassNK to utilise ultra-high strength steel with a yield strength of 470 MPa (the unit of stress pressure) in their hull structures to to reduce the steel weight of the ship by avoiding extreme plate thicknesses. The reinforcement on the hulls of the sister ships was performed by MHI to twice the level required by ClassNK.
Container shipping can see ‘green shoots’ of freight demand recovery
B: China, Brazil strike deal to ditch dollar for trade
Supply chains 'finally beginning to stabilise', says Maersk
Maersk 'on a journey' as it snaps up frozen foods logistics specialist
ONE becomes joint-owner of Seaspan Corp in $11bn takeover
DB Schenker sale – storm clouds gathering
AirBridgeCargo to relaunch with Russian aircraft, amid legal wrangles
Shippers reject carriers' opposition to ending anti-trust rules
Winning the race to 2026: Kuehne vs DSV vs DHL Global Forwarding
Marshall Islands in urgent talks with carriers after cargo is stranded by ban
Ceva reorg accelerates as rumours give way to action
Yang Ming says shippers taking time to commit to contracts as rates fall
Comment on this article
Nelson CarliniFebruary 14, 2014 at 12:26 pm
After strengthenig a subsequent claim may be imposed relted to the reduction of cargo deadweight!