DP World announces 'transformative' expansion plan for Caucedo hub
Global terminal operator DP World is set to plough some $760m into its Caribbean transhipment ...
This story has been updated with the following statement from MSC.
“The Loadstar incorrectly reported that MSC has announced the suspension of bookings of cargo for export from the UK. In fact, MSC continues to accept bookings on all trades and has worked hard to provide ...
Keep our news independent, by supporting The Loadstar
Rapid transpacific capacity build-up continues – can USWC ports handle it?
Red Sea crisis has driven most new capacity into extended Asia-Europe trades
Crew forced to abandon ship in latest fire on vessel carrying EVs
Carriers on the hunt for open tonnage again as transpacific rates soar
The Loadstar Podcast | Transport Logistic and Air Cargo Europe 2025
'Now or never' for Kuehne and DHL GF to hit back at DSV
Uncertainty drives Yang Ming fleet boost as focus switches to Asia-Europe trades
Asia-West Africa ULCV deployment opens new markets for carriers
Carrier price hikes hold, driving spot rates higher as space gets scarcer
Project cargo: oversized and heavy, posing risks outside the norm for ports
CMA CGM eyeing multi-billion euro investment programme in Algeria
News in Brief Podcast | Week 22 | Trump’s tariff hurdle, ocean schedule reliability, and rate rise
Air cargo players still wary of long-term block space deals – 'a risk on both sides'
Longer-term planning needed as noise out of Washington distorts the market
Geely splashes out to meet growing demand by chartering its own car-carrier
Comment on this article
G Bryan
December 07, 2020 at 10:25 pmI suspect a lack of forward planning partially by the shipping companies themselves. Had they shown more interest in the Bristol “Super port” scheme which had planning consent then it is likely that this dilemma would never have happened as there would have been sufficient capacity. I would remind some that MSC have been using Portbury for years so were well aware of the scheme and the possibilities presented by a deep water port in the Bristol area.
Alan Kelly
December 08, 2020 at 5:19 amLooks like we are going back to the problems of yesteryear, the ports need to be working as near to a 100 percent as possible which is not the case at the moment, from my point of view as a transport driver working from Felixstowe and Immingham docks the systems seem to be set up to be as slow as possible with very little leeway for vehicles turning up early or late and being turned away and having to rebook leaving loads having to return a 2nd time and containers and trailers remaining on the docks when they should have been removed promptly which is highly frustrating for both haulage companys and drivers alike, as most times its outside the control of the haulage companys and drivers, it has been for years an attitude of if you don’t do it the way we want you don’t do it, we all need to work together to get goods in and out as fast as possible which will need a change in attitude from all concerned
David Meacham
December 08, 2020 at 2:30 pmSo why not use DLP World Essex? (London Gateway)??? It is big enough to cope!!
matthew griggs
December 08, 2020 at 11:30 pmPort of felixstowe’s incompetence could cost alot of local drivers there jobs.
Again the driver bearing the brunt of someone else’s cock ups
Alan Rouse ( former hauler )
December 09, 2020 at 8:48 amFelixstowe has never considered haulers needs, they also have a bad attitude.
Everything should be fine now they have made the stunning decision to bring Failing Grayling on board