Stay clear of switch bills of lading warning to forwarders
Forwarders are being warned to stay clear of switch bills of lading (SB/Ls) following increased ...
Freight forwarders have been warned that the recent trend by shipping lines to impose container no-show and booking cancellation fees could leave intermediaries exposed to “accounting nightmares”.
In recent months, ocean carriers have begun to tackle the problem of cargo no shows/late cancellations and applied a variety of fees, and the wording of their conditions are crucial to forwarders.
The fee is levied on the party that made the booking, rather than the beneficial cargo owner, notes online freight forwarder iContainers, which suggests forwarders draw ...
Maersk Air Cargo sees volumes fall as it aims for 'margin in favour of revenue'
Keep our news independent, by supporting The Loadstar
Container spot rates diverge: to Europe still falling, but firmer to the US
Hapag-Lloyd won't take bookings if port congestion leaves cargo stranded
Ecommerce likely the front-runner in resurge of transpacific trade after deal
Airfreight players eye new routes as demand on the transpacific nosedives
China-US trade tariff pause could drive a rebound for transpacific rates
Service chaos from trade ban with India a problem for Pakistan shippers
Volume surge and an early peak season? 'Don't celebrate too soon,' warning
Airfreight rates ex-China 'loss-making', but hopes of a trade deal stay high
Indian coastal freight attracts major carriers, but regional tension disrupts
Serious threat to jobs in US logistics as tariffs cause economic 'stagflation'
APMM floats along on 'solid' Q1 profitability in Ocean, well prepared for choppy water
White House u-turns see freighters flying but keep logistics players on their toes
Carriers impose 'emergency operation' surcharges on Pakistan cargo
MSC in terminal switch as Nhava Sheva gets strong start to new fiscal year
Comment on this article
Andres Pelaez
June 22, 2017 at 1:50 pmInteresting article.. And you can understand that shipping lines wants to charge from users this kind of incidents. You might think then that the other way would also work to show fair treatment. Let`s say for example, shipping lines paying shippers or freight forwarders when they roll over containers due to “lack of space” on vessels; or when they decide not to call some port and your cargo faces ETD delays.
Andy Lane
June 30, 2017 at 4:39 pmFully agreed, it should be bi-lateral, to be objective and fair.
For the “intermediaries”, a simple charge on +++, would be the only hedge required.
The entire supply chain will benefit from greater reliability and transparency, all need to contribute to make it truly work and enforceable. The time is ripe for change.