Flexport's Petersen: 'It’s been a crazy couple of months” (VIDEO)
Flexport CEO Ryan Petersen joined a PBS’s Amanpour & Company show to discuss how shippers are ...
WTC: RIDE THE WAVEFDX: TOP EXEC OUTPEP: TOP PERFORMER KO: STEADY YIELD AND KEY APPOINTMENTAAPL: SUPPLIER IPOCHRW: SLIGHTLY DOWNBEAT BUT UPSIDE REMAINSDHL: TOP PRIORITIESDHL: SPECULATIVE OCEAN TRADEDHL: CFO REMARKSPLD: BEATING ESTIMATESPLD: TRADING UPDATEBA: TRUMP TRADE
WTC: RIDE THE WAVEFDX: TOP EXEC OUTPEP: TOP PERFORMER KO: STEADY YIELD AND KEY APPOINTMENTAAPL: SUPPLIER IPOCHRW: SLIGHTLY DOWNBEAT BUT UPSIDE REMAINSDHL: TOP PRIORITIESDHL: SPECULATIVE OCEAN TRADEDHL: CFO REMARKSPLD: BEATING ESTIMATESPLD: TRADING UPDATEBA: TRUMP TRADE
A blog by Kontainers, the platform for freight forwarders, has come up with some interesting numbers. It argues that, instead of seeing investment in freight technology as a cost, companies should look at it as a way to increase the bottom line value of a business. Using the example of Flexport, the blog notes that last year it moved 70,000 teu and had a value of $900m. But Apex Marine, bought by Kerry, in 2015 was valued at $175m, yet moved over 270,000 teu. That gives Flexport a market value some 19 times higher – or an implied value of $12,850 per teu moved versus Apex at just $650. An interesting argument.
MSC switches two more Asia-Europe port calls from congested Antwerp
Canada and Mexico get cosy with trade plan to bypass US
Front-loading frenzy has made traditional H2 peak season 'unlikely'
Tradelanes: Export boom in Indian sub-continent triggers rise in airfreight rates
Carriers introduce surcharges as congestion builds at African ports
Mexican airport modernisation plan unlikely to boost cargo facilities
Tradelanes: Overcapacity on Asia-S America impacting alliances and rates
Ports and supply chain operators weigh in on funding for CPB
Comment on this article