Two winners from the Red Sea crisis: the shipping lines and Houthis
“Vessels ‘go dark’ to avoid Houthi attacks,” blared headlines as 2024 kicked in, and commercial ...
Let me begin today’s column with some special praise for five of my industry sources, whom I’ve nicknamed Mr Big, an industry executive (North America); T Island, supply chain specialist (APAC); Oasis, industry finance veteran (Europe); The Doctor, a freight forwarding innovator (North America); and Sunshine (Europe), a freight forwarding veteran.
With 127 years’ market experience between them, what they also have in common is that, little by little and from very different perspectives, they have added immense value to the debate surrounding ...
US port dispute: 'the carriers and USMX are going to lose this battle'
Rates update, week 51: GRIs boost prices, with more to come in January
The US Line: My feud with Flexport CEO Ryan Petersen
Recent lay-offs in logistics could well be 'a harbinger of headwinds'
Yang Ming to order 13 newbuild box ships for fleet renewal and new markets
‘Customers should be customers of each of our business lines’, says Geodis chief
Two winners from the Red Sea crisis: the shipping lines and Houthis
Happy last year in air freight (for some) – and good luck with the next
Comment on this article
chas deller
November 05, 2018 at 2:34 pmAnother excellent and well presented view point.
Ale Pasetti
November 05, 2018 at 9:15 pmMany thanks, Chas. Much appreciated!
Gary Ferrulli
November 05, 2018 at 3:34 pmWhile there is no question about 2018 being a less than stellar year for carriers, primarily due to their own poor decisions on 2018 and 2018/2019 Contracts,
you seem to take the Asia/Europe market as the only one in the world. It is
of course extremely important, but so is the TP and Intra-Asia. Are those two,
which are larger than Asia/Europe, with their very high spot market rates,
enough to offset the Asia/Europe issues? We’ll know in February/March not
next week.
Ale Pasetti
November 05, 2018 at 9:14 pmYou are right, it’s better elsewhere, but I opted for “it does not look good elsewhere, as global growth projections come under strain.” In other words, I have normalised the rates. So, it doesn’t look good anywhere, given the input costs and mix, IMO. Thanks, GFERRULLI.
Ale Pasetti
November 08, 2018 at 7:17 am(8 Nov) ON A ROLL: Hapag Q3 out, 10% ebitda beat, €0.64 quarterly EPS vs ~ €0.40 expected; 9M EPS @ ~ €0.03 (9M 2017: €0.05). Still, ROIC @ 3.2% vs ~ 8% WACC, net debt unchanged @ €5.6bn, while FcF is lower y-o-y, but healthy, as it keeps a lid on staff costs, down 7.3% below half a billion euros y-o-y.