© Vladimir Serebryanskiy HMM
© Vladimir Serebryanskiy

The world’s largest containership lessor says it has had no approaches from ocean carrier customers to renegotiate charter rates and is confident its contracted revenue of $6bn is secure.

Questioned during a Q4 and 2015 results teleconference, Seaspan Corporation chairman and chief executive Gerry Wang confirmed its business ...

To read this article you need to subscribe.

Help us to continue to invest in award-winning independent journalism. For an introductory offer of just £70 a year, or £10 per month, get access to all our daily news stories and opinion. If you are already a registered user, please login below with your current account's email and password to subscribe. If you are not registered and want to subscribe, please register below to subscribe.
Current subscriber
New subscriber

Comment on this article


You must be logged in to post a comment.
  • John

    March 10, 2016 at 4:09 pm

    I think vessel lessors need to look at the long term picture. The idle fleet size is increasing, as each day passes they become closer to the end of charter agreements, no one will want to renew their charter agreements at higher rates than they are paying now plus with the decrease in steel prices, buying a new ship now is a lot cheaper than it was 5-10 years ago. Somebody somewhere is going to end up with vessels they paid too much for that aren’t worth a lot as scrap and that nobody wants to charter. As the ships get cheaper, they become more attractive for the lines to buy rather than charter. Other lessors are struggling so they will be offering cheap deals to the market.
    Sooner or later the shipping lines will reduce capacity which means they need less ships.
    At the moment, I wouldn’t describe the future as robust.

  • Mike Wackett

    March 11, 2016 at 1:07 pm

    Hi John,
    Much hinges on the sacrosanct nature of a charter party.
    Seaspan and other non-operating owners would argue that carriers should have realised the importance of the contract before putting their signature to the charter party.
    In this respect Seaspan’s business model is watertight and could be described as ‘robust’.
    We will have to see what happens with the HMM situation, but if the flood gates were to open…….