CMA CGM eyes shipbuilding deal and coastal operations in India
French container line CMA CGM is reportedly in the final stages of a market evaluation ...
The world’s largest containership lessor says it has had no approaches from ocean carrier customers to renegotiate charter rates and is confident its contracted revenue of $6bn is secure.
Questioned during a Q4 and 2015 results teleconference, Seaspan Corporation chairman and chief executive Gerry Wang confirmed its business model, of long-term ship charters on a fixed daily hire rate to ‘blue chip’ container lines, was robust and offered long-term security to its banks.
“We have not received any renegotiation requests, nor do we expect ...
MSC Elsa 3 sinking – now the 'blame game' begins
After DSV 'cuts the cake' on Schenker acquisition, time for redundancies?
Shippers hold their breath as Trump appeals court ruling that tariffs are illegal
Bad news for shippers as wave of transpacific rate increases continues
Houthis claim Red Sea safe for box ships not calling at port of Haifa
No deals with carriers, say Houthis – Red Sea safe for non Israel-affiliated ships
Rapid transpacific capacity build-up continues – can USWC ports handle it?
Schenker's Shirley Sharma Paterson moves to K+N as global head of sales
Carriers on the hunt for open tonnage again as transpacific rates soar
Dates to watch for in the latest chapter of TACO's tariff travail
Evergreen chief warns of USWC congestion as demand for ocean capacity grows
Freighter capacity on the rise, with air cargo demand expected to pick up
Uncertainty drives Yang Ming fleet boost as focus switches to Asia-Europe trades
Liner schedule reliability improving, with Gemini carriers leading the way
Red Sea crisis has driven most new capacity into extended Asia-Europe trades
Comment on this article
John
March 10, 2016 at 4:09 pmI think vessel lessors need to look at the long term picture. The idle fleet size is increasing, as each day passes they become closer to the end of charter agreements, no one will want to renew their charter agreements at higher rates than they are paying now plus with the decrease in steel prices, buying a new ship now is a lot cheaper than it was 5-10 years ago. Somebody somewhere is going to end up with vessels they paid too much for that aren’t worth a lot as scrap and that nobody wants to charter. As the ships get cheaper, they become more attractive for the lines to buy rather than charter. Other lessors are struggling so they will be offering cheap deals to the market.
Sooner or later the shipping lines will reduce capacity which means they need less ships.
At the moment, I wouldn’t describe the future as robust.
Mike Wackett
March 11, 2016 at 1:07 pmHi John,
Much hinges on the sacrosanct nature of a charter party.
Seaspan and other non-operating owners would argue that carriers should have realised the importance of the contract before putting their signature to the charter party.
In this respect Seaspan’s business model is watertight and could be described as ‘robust’.
We will have to see what happens with the HMM situation, but if the flood gates were to open…….