NYK signs up for direct air carbon capture scheme
Direct Air Carbon Capture and Storage (DACCS), derided as one of the least efficient possible ...
XOM: GO GREEN NOWKNIN: BOUNCING OFF NEW LOWS HON: BREAK-UP PRESSURECHRW: UPGRADESZIM: LAGGARDFWRD: LEADINGMAERSK: OPPORTUNISTIC UPGRADETSLA: GETTING OUTDSV: DOWN BELOW KEY LEVELLINE: DOWN TO ALL-TIME LOWS AMZN: DEI HURDLESAAPL: DEI RECOMMENDATIONAAPL: INNOVATIONF: MAKING MONEY IN CHINAMAERSK: THE DAY AFTER
XOM: GO GREEN NOWKNIN: BOUNCING OFF NEW LOWS HON: BREAK-UP PRESSURECHRW: UPGRADESZIM: LAGGARDFWRD: LEADINGMAERSK: OPPORTUNISTIC UPGRADETSLA: GETTING OUTDSV: DOWN BELOW KEY LEVELLINE: DOWN TO ALL-TIME LOWS AMZN: DEI HURDLESAAPL: DEI RECOMMENDATIONAAPL: INNOVATIONF: MAKING MONEY IN CHINAMAERSK: THE DAY AFTER
It takes a speed reduction of just 10 to 15 miles per hour to cut emissions from ships dramatically, according to new research. And to do so near land would cut smog and improve the health of those living in port cities. The trouble, writes this US-focused article, is that few ports have signed up to a scheme requiring vessels to slow down within 40 nautical miles of a port. Given that the shipping industry is not part of the Kyoto Protocol. and that the IMO has not set a cap on greenhouse gas emissions, this could be an effective, albeit small, step in the right direction.
US port strike called off as ILA and USMX reach 'tentative' agreement
$7bn infrastructure project heads list of expansion plans for India's busy ports
Alliance reshuffle will increase box ship shortage as carriers hunt 'buffers'
Evergreen staff bonuses soar again, as carrier profits triple
Shipping Australia calls for end to 'disruptive' port strikes
Three new services and a transpacific focus for Ocean Alliance in 2025
Ripples from 2025 CNY 'may still be rocking the boats in summer'
Launch of new tariffs 'a speeding train', be ready, US importers warned
Comment on this article