Subscribe to Premium
Subscribe to Premium
Advanced Search
+

Comment / Shipper radar: We put a value on Costco's charters but don't forget the consumer

dreamstime_s_89060321
Photo 89060321 © Larisa Kapustkina | Dreamstime.com
By

The Q&A part of Costco Wholesale Corp’s earnings call last week revealed – as widely reported everywhere within and outside logistics – that the wholesaler has become the latest shipper to charter its own vessels to mitigate the continuing transpacific container supply chain crunch.

But how much the deal is worth didn’t seem to receive the attention it deserved, neither in absolute nor relative terms against its heavy capital spending (aka capex) plans – as well as versus its dividend and ...

Subscription required for Premium stories

In order to view the entire article please login with a valid subscription below or subscribe to Premium

Or buy full access to this story for £15.00

Please login to activate the purchase link or sign up here to register an account

Premium subscriber
New Premium subscriber REGISTER

Comment on this article

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • John Snow

    October 06, 2021 at 1:19 pm

    Great work here! I believe, though, that shipping costs are booked to Merchandise Costs (COGS) on the income statement instead of capex on the cash flow statement at Costco. In FY21, Merchandise Costs were $170.7 billion, so $100 million as a percentage of that is even more irrelevant!

    • Alessandro Pasetti

      October 06, 2021 at 1:45 pm

      Hi John,

      Many thanks for the feedback, it also helps explain why we specifically referenced capex as well as other cash outflow items (acquisitions, dividends), rather than COGS, knowing that COGS was a massive number. We probably should have said that.

      Certainly they aren’t capex and we didn’t mean to suggest that – yes, it’s COGS, as you said, although merchandise expenses are all grouped under “operating costs”, so there may be a non-COGS component too in those charters. Also to say, we wanted to show that tiny cost “investment” against all different capital allocation levers… essentially the added cost budgeted for the charters is irrelevant and doesn’t affect cash flows, that was the purpose of the exercise.

      In other words, should this situation become permanent, its capital allocation will very unlikely be affected, unless we believe it could charter a significantly larger number of vessels of that kind.

      Hope it helps.

      Best regards,

      Ale

Related Stories

Topics

Charter parties Costco Customer-carrier relations Schedule reliability Shipper radar Transpacific Trade