No lows at Lowe's (yet)
Market share rules
The Q&A part of Costco Wholesale Corp’s earnings call last week revealed – as widely reported everywhere within and outside logistics – that the wholesaler has become the latest shipper to charter its own vessels to mitigate the continuing transpacific container supply chain crunch.
But how much the deal is worth didn’t seem to receive the attention it deserved, neither in absolute nor relative terms against its heavy capital spending (aka capex) plans – as well as versus its dividend and ...
Container freight rates: 'collapse' is the word, says Xeneta
CMA CGM liner trades pummelled in Q1 – and there's worse to come
Mexican rail seizures give near-shoring interests pause for thought
Cargo shifts back to US west coast ports, but some has gone for good
Worker no-shows force US west coast port terminal shutdowns
Digital forwarders back in the spotlight: can they compete?
Major box lines still fighting over diminishing supply of smaller ships
'Alarming signals' as airfreight capacity rises and rates fall
Hapag-Lloyd CEO bullish on prospects for a peak season
Hapag-Lloyd kicks off its ship demolition programme
Evergreen and Wan Hai face up to bearish market as profits tumble
FedEx pilots win ‘tentative agreement’ on new contract after strike threat
Comment on this article
John SnowOctober 06, 2021 at 1:19 pm
Great work here! I believe, though, that shipping costs are booked to Merchandise Costs (COGS) on the income statement instead of capex on the cash flow statement at Costco. In FY21, Merchandise Costs were $170.7 billion, so $100 million as a percentage of that is even more irrelevant!
Alessandro PasettiOctober 06, 2021 at 1:45 pm
Many thanks for the feedback, it also helps explain why we specifically referenced capex as well as other cash outflow items (acquisitions, dividends), rather than COGS, knowing that COGS was a massive number. We probably should have said that.
Certainly they aren’t capex and we didn’t mean to suggest that – yes, it’s COGS, as you said, although merchandise expenses are all grouped under “operating costs”, so there may be a non-COGS component too in those charters. Also to say, we wanted to show that tiny cost “investment” against all different capital allocation levers… essentially the added cost budgeted for the charters is irrelevant and doesn’t affect cash flows, that was the purpose of the exercise.
In other words, should this situation become permanent, its capital allocation will very unlikely be affected, unless we believe it could charter a significantly larger number of vessels of that kind.
Hope it helps.