Car makers push back over EU/UK battery deal
Car manufacturers are attempting to push back against the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement (TCA) ...
Beleaguered UK secretary of state for transport Chris Grayling has again been rapped, for reportedly failing to provide for freight traffic on a proposed upgrade to the Trans-Pennine rail corridor.
A report in The Guardian claims £3bn will be spent upgrading 76 miles of track. which includes adding tunnels that are too small for modern freight trains.
A spokesperson for PD Ports described it as “short-sighted” and a threat to UK economic growth.
“After more than two years of assurances from the transport department that rail freight was to be an integral part of the scheme, this decision represents a concerning last-minute reversal that would serve to negatively impact the growth prospects of the region.”
Teesport handles around 500,000 teu a year and claimed to have seen the highest box growth rate of any UK port in 2017.
It opened an intermodal rail terminal in 2014, which has seen around 12% annual growth since, and the spokesperson said it continued to see “significant” modal shift, with an anticipated 50% increase in rail volumes over the next decade.
“Failing to invest on the Trans-Pennine route could seriously damage the economic aims of the ‘Northern Powerhouse’ and would leave an over-reliance on the heavily congested M62.”
The spokesperson urged Mr Grayling to reconsider a proposed upgrade that would exclude rail freight services from the tracks.
“It is already clear that the ongoing lack of HGV drivers is impeding supply chains in the UK and constraining the growth and development of our ports. Therefore, this proposed decision to remove an alternative option of rail transport for freight could have a devastating effect on freight distribution, particularly after Brexit.
“We are now facing the prospect of a block to growth in what has become an extremely proactive region for the UK economy.”
Another industry source told The Loadstar shippers would be willing to commit high volumes on Trans-Pennine services.
“This, however, requires them seeing government support for the service and reasonable pricing – if they get this, then they will commit volumes,” said the source.
“The ultimate dream is to have a rail freight link connecting Peel port in Liverpool with Teesport and the port of Tyne.”
Container freight rates: 'collapse' is the word, says Xeneta
CMA CGM liner trades pummelled in Q1 – and there's worse to come
Mexican rail seizures give near-shoring interests pause for thought
Cargo shifts back to US west coast ports, but some has gone for good
Digital forwarders back in the spotlight: can they compete?
Major box lines still fighting over diminishing supply of smaller ships
'Alarming signals' as airfreight capacity rises and rates fall
Evergreen and Wan Hai face up to bearish market as profits tumble
Worker no-shows force US west coast port terminal shutdowns
FedEx pilots win ‘tentative agreement’ on new contract after strike threat
Comment on this article
Michael BellJanuary 05, 2019 at 10:46 am
Our problem is lact of Cross-Pennine routes. The Huddersfield -Standedge-Stalybridge route is hopelessly inadequate and connot be improved to a worthwhile standard. Among other things in my website http://www.thornshapedroute.com/, I propose a route closely following the M62 from Leeds to near Junction 22 and vaiduct over the Vlillage of Newhey, mximum gradient 1:83 to Manchester Victoria