Rates still slipping as peak season recedes and port strike threat subsides
Freight rates are continuing their downward correction following the premature peak season and front-loading of ...
AAPL: SHIFTING PRODUCTIONUPS: GIVING UP KNIN: INDIA FOCUSXOM: ANOTHER WARNING VW: GROWING STRESSBA: OVERSUBSCRIBED AND UPSIZEDF: PRESSED ON INVENTORY TRENDSF: INVENTORY ON THE RADARF: CEO ON RECORD BA: CAPITAL RAISING EXERCISEXPO: SAIA BOOSTDSV: UPGRADEBA: ANOTHER JUMBO FUNDRAISINGXPO: SAIA READ-ACROSSHLAG: BOUYANT BUSINESS
AAPL: SHIFTING PRODUCTIONUPS: GIVING UP KNIN: INDIA FOCUSXOM: ANOTHER WARNING VW: GROWING STRESSBA: OVERSUBSCRIBED AND UPSIZEDF: PRESSED ON INVENTORY TRENDSF: INVENTORY ON THE RADARF: CEO ON RECORD BA: CAPITAL RAISING EXERCISEXPO: SAIA BOOSTDSV: UPGRADEBA: ANOTHER JUMBO FUNDRAISINGXPO: SAIA READ-ACROSSHLAG: BOUYANT BUSINESS
Shippers have called on carriers, infrastructure operators and freight service providers to improve visibility in the ocean freight supply chain.
Speaking at the European Shippers’ Council’s Maritime Day in Rotterdam last week, Bart Kuipers of the city’s Erasmus University said ports had a particularly bad reputation.
“One shipper told me that whenever someone mentions the phrase ‘sea port’ to him, he shudders,” said Mr Kuipers.
“He compares the problems he has experienced at ports – and those colleagues have told him of – to black holes, places where things can happen without any visibility.”
Senior advisor in Drewry’s supply chain team Stijn Rubens said he believed part of the problem with lack of transparency in shipping was due to the industry’s fragmentation.
However, despite the complexities involved in improving visibility, there had been some effort by liners to achieve this, he added.
“Although this comes with the caveat of a very big ‘but’,” continued Mr Rubens. “There are core problems, such as how you handle all the data if you adopt a technological solution to improve things.
“Would shippers be willing to pay for all that data, and would they be willing to deal with it, and also know how to deal with it? There are two sides to every story.”
Belgian Shippers’ Council vice president Jurgen Huygh said transparency was “very important” for cargo owners. In particular, he noted, shippers wanted improved visibility on pricing and charges, as the rates they were being given did not always “tell the whole story”.
“We go to the forwarder, we get a price, but this is not the complete price; there are multiple surcharges that we then have to add on,” said Mr Huygh.
“If you look only at the container price, this is the wrong reflection when choosing a carrier and forwarder, so you need the full cost to make the complete decision.”
Even so, he acknowledged, there had been improvements over recent years when it came to carriers enhancing visibility. He cited the ability, on shipping lines’ websites, to see where ships are, what their expected arrival time is at ports and any issues that may affect this.
“And there is more neutral data now, which means you can reflect on what you’re being told. This allows you to see if what your supply chain partners are telling you is genuine, or if there is party at fault trying to offload its responsibilities.”
Comment on this article
Kumar
March 26, 2019 at 6:41 amYes, it is true..carriers has to provide clear picture to their customers to avoid unnecessary confusion and losses
Paul Newman
March 26, 2019 at 4:58 pmThe Ports need a Community Service Provider (CSP) with a system like Destin8, CNS or CCSUK & then everybody has full visibility of anything happening within the port but nobody outside of the UK has such systems,
Frederik deCockBuning
March 31, 2019 at 7:50 pmTypical example of ‘out of hand ‘ containerisation. it is unbelievable that after
more than nearly 50 years the door to door is still not under control !
Frederik deCockBuning
March 31, 2019 at 7:52 pmKumar it is not the carrier .. it is the middle man