Cancelled voyages take the sting out of spot rate declines this week
Container freight spot rates maintained their downward trajectory this week, as tariff uncertainty continued to ...
UK shippers have entered 2019 facing significantly higher inland container transport pricing, as shipping lines look to recoup raised haulage and empty container repositioning costs.
Sources told The Loadstar the cost of transporting a container from a deepsea gateway to the interior had risen 10-40%, with few opportunities to negotiate discounts.
“The price of a box going to the north-west of the UK from Felixstowe has gone up by about £200, and whereas rail used to be competitive versus road on price, ...
Asia-USEC shippers to lose 42% capacity in a surge of blanked sailings
USTR fees will lead to 'complete destabilisation' of container shipping alliances
New USTR port fees threaten shipping and global supply chains, says Cosco
Outlook for container shipping 'more uncertain now than at the onset of Covid'
Transpac container service closures mount
DHL Express suspends non-de minimis B2C parcels to US consumers
Zim ordered to pay Samsung $3.7m for 'wrongful' D&D charges
Flexport lawsuit an 'undifferentiated mass of gibberish', claims Freightmate
Comment on this article
Martyn Benson
January 08, 2019 at 9:34 pmWhy should the exporter pay £ 200 when the problem is caused by a surplus of imports?
Surely the exporters are part of the solution, not the problem so why burden them with penalty charges?
Boxes going from FLX to the north west by road or rail? Why don’t the importers use Liverpool as their port of discharge instead of patronising southern ports (re: Cargo200 from Peel Ports). From my own calculations on the US and canada trades, at least half the containers destined or originating the northern half of the country were running via FLX, LDN or SOU, where it would be cheaper to move through LPL, so whose fault is it that inland costs are rising and who is not checking the least cost alternatives?