Peak season hopes dashed as freight rates slip again
The prospect of a traditional peak season is slipping away with each week that passes ...
While some US ports and container terminals still resist a regulatory drive to curtail detention and demurrage (D&D) charges, several shipping lines have stopped charging cargo owners and truckers on days when terminals are closed.
The threat of further legislation against antitrust immunity may be a factor.
The US Federal Maritime Commission (FMC) has been questioning container terminals and the 11 largest box lines serving the US on their policy of charging D&D fees when their facilities are closed.
Over the past couple of years shippers and truckers have protested furiously over being charged when they had been unable to get access to congested terminals.
These protests were the fuel for the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 2022, which charged the FMC with new rulemaking and guidance on D&D, and the authority duly produced a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, aimed at curtailing the elbow room for terminals and carriers to levy such charges.
One of notice’s controversial elements is that terminals should have a direct contractual relationship with cargo owners in order to bill them for demurrage. This would force terminals to charge carriers, who would then pass the bill to their clients.
But the bigger concern for terminals is the plan to ban charges for days when port facilities are closed. An early taste of this came in December, when the FMC ordered Evergreen to refund $510 to a trucking company for detention fees levied in 2020 when the terminal in question was closed over the Memorial Day weekend.
FMC chairman Daniel Maffei said the organisation was not out to ban D&D charges, which he called “very important to keep cargo flowing”, but stressed it wanted to change “what I believe has become a practice of using demurrage and detention as a revenue centre, as opposed to strictly an incentive to pick up cargo and return equipment”.
Ports America and the National Association of Waterfront Employers argue the FMC is overstepping its mandate, but no longer have the full backing of the container lines. Over the past month, three have announced they are axing D&D charges on days when facilities are closed.
Maersk was the first to declare its change of policy and HMM and MSC followed suit. Both HMM and MSC said they were working with the FMC on the issue, signalling that they had come to terms with the prospect of the emerging rules banning charges in such situations. The final set of rules from the FMC is due on 15 June.
“The carriers know they pulled a fast one,” said one industry executive. “Over the past two years they began to claw back contractual excess free times they had previously granted customers. Simultaneously they raised the daily D&D fees,” he added.
And there may be another reason for the carriers’ conciliatory stance: a new, bipartisan, piece of legislation now before the US Congress seeks to repeal limited antitrust immunity for non-US ocean carriers.
The authors of the proposed Ocean Shipping Antitrust Enforcement Act claim it would stop alleged abuses by carriers, from price gouging to refusing to accept US export shipments. A similar draft bill was tabled last year by one of the congressmen involved this time, but failed to gather support.
Container lines are concerned about the headwinds they are facing from regulators, the industry executive reckoned, and added: “They’re nervous because of the antagonistic stance of the European Commission and the FMC.”
CMA CGM liner trades pummelled in Q1 – and there's worse to come
Container freight rates: 'collapse' is the word, says Xeneta
Mexican rail seizures give near-shoring interests pause for thought
Major box lines still fighting over diminishing supply of smaller ships
Cargo shifts back to US west coast ports, but some has gone for good
Evergreen and Wan Hai face up to bearish market as profits tumble
UPS names John Bolla new president of global healthcare
FedEx pilots win ‘tentative agreement’ on new contract after strike threat
'Alarming signals' as airfreight capacity rises and rates fall
'Keep 'em peeled' alert as drug smuggling into Europe's ports increases
Congress mulls raft of supply chain bills – but one is missing, say BCOs
Comment on this article
Rajeev KathuriaApril 09, 2023 at 10:09 am
If Terminal /Carrier are supposed to Facilitate the ease Movement, so that under no circumstances the Trucker to wait more than 10-12 Minutes ,as this will reduce the Carbon Foot print if Trucker has to be in queues for long hours .Further No Demurrages /Detention if their is Waiting time Over 12 Minutes.Rather they Should pay to Trucker for Waiting