Stevedoring down under – where some playing fields are less level than others
Either way, Mr and Ms Consumer lose
A court in Australia has ruled that a freight forwarder’s terms and conditions (T&Cs) can be incorporated through an email ‘footer’, despite the absence of a signed contract.
The ruling was made in the recent County Court of Victoria case of cargo owner Technology Swiss versus freight forwarder Famous Pacific Shipping (FPS).
That case dates back to 2014, when the shipper paid FPS to transport some mining equipment from Melbourne to Bangkok.
According to the court filing, the forwarder “failed to adequately secure ...
European port congestion now at five-to-six days, and getting worse
Keep our news independent, by supporting The Loadstar
'Cargo collision' expected as transpacific capacity tightens and rates rise
Houthis declare blockade of port of Haifa – 'vessels calling will be targets'
Another CMA CGM vessel heading for Suez Canal – 'to mitigate schedule delay'
Ocean rates rise after tariff pause acts as 'starting gun' for more front-loading
News in Brief Podcast | Week 20 | 90-day countdown, India and Pakistan
Navigating supply chain trends in 2025: efficiency, visibility, and adaptability
Demand for transpac airfreight capacity returning – but 'it's not ecommerce-driven'
CMA CGM will carry on investing after 'solid' Q1, despite unclear outlook
Air cargo forwarders stick to spot rates – a long-term contract would be 'foolish'
Yang Ming chief announces rethink on ordering 'megamax' box ships
Comment on this article
Andy Robins
December 02, 2019 at 3:05 amI presume the full amount had to be paid due to a negligence argument, (failure to secure the cargo probably).
Perhaps forwarders in this digital age should make the STC’s (as it limits liability) at the footer of the page a direct link to their STC’s.
I see many still advise “available on request”, whereas “click here” would suffice.